AI Rate Professor

Zoology

Catalina Reyes-Gonzalez

ZOO203 · BIPN106 · ZOO145 · Z00 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other section; and grind for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear ExpectationsLong LecturesHarsh Lab GradingHard ExamsInexperienced Teaching
  • Most students say and .
  • Lectures run very long; lab reports graded hard; .
  • A few students who work hard still pass, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students say you must and tests, and grades still suffer from harsh marking and unfair finals.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material is hard and lectures do not clarify what to study, so content feels more difficult than it should.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory for long multi-hour lectures.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0% and most comments .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and an unreasonably timed final leave students feeling unfairly punished.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are dry , and needs more teaching experience.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and harshly graded lab reports drive the course grade.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person zoology and physiology students report , and frequent do-not-take advice.

Main concern

and unfair final timing can wreck even strong students.

What students said

“the ”
BIPN106
“ !! Listen I wish I would have listened I lost my 4.0 because of it”
31244
“Doesn't have a clue how to teach”
ZOO203

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be long and poorly timed with , so risk is high.

Long FinalTime PressureUnclear Study FocusHard Lab Reports

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms criticized for length, timing, and .

In-Person FinalTime PressureUnclear Expectations
“She told us to finish in two hours even though the ”
BIPN106
“Doesn't clarify what she wants ”
ZOO203

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! Listen I wish I would have listened I lost my 4.0 because of it, and I'm a great student, there are plenty of !”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews , and recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Clarity

28/100

“Doesn't have a clue how to teach”

📝

25/100

“the ”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“You really have to work hard and tests”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Blows through pp slideshows
  • style of teaching is extremely boring and dry
  • She doesn't clarify anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She
  • It's up to you if you want an A, then work hard and you will get it

Theme 3

⏱️ About Lectures

  • lectures can run a good 2-31/2 hours
  • Lectures for hours on end
  • lectures can be long but it will help you in the long run

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly negative in-person reviews with consistent complaints about teaching clarity, though sample size is modest and a few positive outliers exist.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ZOO2035 reviews
312441 review
BIPN1061 review
Z001 review
ZOO1451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values