AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Naomi Lowe

SOC125 · PSYC100 · PSYC220 · PSYC205 · PSYCH225 · PSYCH210 · SOC205 · PSYCH100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Consider Lowe for stats if you will attend and , but be cautious with online or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStats Breakdown StrengthInconsistent OrganizationGroup Project HeavyCurve and Open NotesOnline Hybrid Friction
  • Strong praise for statistics and attend.
  • Sharp criticism for and a hybrid-style online class.
  • Experience varies a lot by course format and section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Curves, open notes, or open book appear in some sections, but homework volume and .

In-person reviews dominate; the one online review reports harder participation requirements and a lower grade path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Stats and , and study, with several students calling classes hard or not an easy A.

In-person evidence is mixed by course; online evidence is limited and negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while others are treated as optional or effectively online-like with little need to attend lectures.

In-person comments conflict by course; the online section still forced live participation or long papers.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students strongly recommend her for stats clarity but and the hybrid online setup.

Online evidence is clearly .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Curves and , but other sections feel picky and high-pressure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and reading make the load substantial in several courses.

Format shift

In-person stats and psych100 reviews emphasize heavy homework; .

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Some students call her amazing at explaining stats, while others say she cannot teach or stays chapters behind.

Format shift

In-person quality is highly course-dependent; the online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Blend of , and projects depending on the course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and harsh reviews of disorganized abnormal psych and group-heavy intro sections.

Main concern

Organization and .

What students said

“She is amazing at breaking things down in the lectures. ! .”
PSYC205
“Totally disorganized, lechtures were constantly 4 chapters behind where we were in homework.”
PSYCH225
“She does give A LOT of HW out of the book so the book is a must! so show up every day!”
PSYC220

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes a hybrid-like setup with weekly group chats, tech problems, and .

Main concern

Forced live group chats and online class.

What students said

“Expect weekly group chats that are terrible quality and always has technical difficulties. If you cannot attend those group chats you MUST write a 5 page paper in order to earn your participation.”
PSYC100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several reviews mention curves, handwritten notes on exams, or .

Curve on ExamsOpen Notes AllowedOpen Book in Some SectionsStudy Guide FocusQuiz Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams often allow notes or open book and as the .

Curved ExamsOne Page NotesOpen BookStudy Guide Driven
“All quizzes and , and she still allows one page both sides of hand written notes for exams.”
PSYCH210
“All the exams and , so passing is easy :)”
PSYC100
“do the study guide (pretty much all that is on the exams) and you'll be set!”
PSYCH210

Online

Online review and focuses on participation chats and .

Live Group Chat ParticipationMakeup Paper Alternative
“ of a Hybrid class.”
PSYC100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I went into , and now I understand it somewhat. She really cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in-person), highlighting course-dependent quality and mixed organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Stats Teaching Strength

75/100

“Professor . As long as you do the homework and show up to class you will be fine.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“This class is terrible. Everything is done online, no point to even show up to class. Her lectures are 4 chapters behind on the .”

🌐 Online Experience

20/100

“Defeats the purpose of an online class. Since you took online for a reason.”

📈 Grade Effort

48/100

“Her class is hard! She is a good teacher but Its not an easy A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is amazing at breaking things down in the lectures.
  • She's really good at explaining things.
  • Just has zero clue. Complete joke.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I received an A in her class...but it was hard earned.
  • Pretty easy class, minus the presentation
  • If .

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work & Structure

  • if you do not like to work with others in a group!
  • We had to do a and present it with our group
  • Expect weekly group chats that are terrible quality and always has technical difficulties.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews with one online and but large course-to-course inconsistency, which lowers confidence in a single overall profile.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYC2053 reviews
PSYCH1003 reviews
PSYCH2103 reviews
PSYC1002 reviews
PSYCH2252 reviews
Show 3 more courses
SOC2052 reviews
PSYC2201 review
SOC1251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values