AI Rate Professor

Behavioral Sciences

Sandra Oevering

AODS155 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you have another option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisrespectful ToneTest Content ErrorsInconsistent Grading PointsAvoid WarningMixed Kindness
  • Two of three students call her among the .
  • Complaints include wrong , and disrespectful talk.
  • One milder review says she is friendly and tests are easy if you read.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student got an A with easy tests if you read, but others still earned only Bs amid fairness complaints.

All evidence is from in-person AODS155 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty sits mid-to-high; content is doable with reading but not described as light.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; one says it was not.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two of three and warn everyone off.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students allege missing participation points and poorly aligned test questions, so .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Light

60/100

One review says tests and the semester project are easy if you read a little.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

, and disrespectful classroom behavior.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Comments center on tests, a semester project, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person AODS155 feedback is mostly negative: two students report a very poor experience with fairness and professionalism, while one finds her friendly with .

Main concern

, and disrespectful classroom talk.

What students said

“By far the ....I would not recommend this professor to ANYONE!!”
AODS155
“She had questions in yet.”
AODS155
“She is a good teacher, friendly and kind.”
AODS155

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can be easy if you read, but students also report questions from uncovered chapters and .

Read-Based TestsMisaligned Test QuestionsParticipation Points

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but may include uncovered chapters; proctoring is not described.

Read-Based TestsMisaligned Test Questions
“The if you read enough and the ”
AODS155
“She had questions in yet.”
AODS155

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the ....I would not recommend this professor to ANYONE!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting strong negative fairness themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This is by far my worst experience with a professor at Palomar.”

⚠️ Fairness Concerns

35/100

“At end of school semester she .”

👍 Minority Positive

55/100

“She is a good teacher, friendly and kind.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Half the time she gave us wrong information.
  • She talks to her students disrespectful.
  • She is a good teacher, friendly and kind.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The if you read enough
  • She had questions in yet.
  • she

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three same-term 2016 reviews with detailed negatives but small sample and some conflict.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AODS1553 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values