AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lixian Chen

MATH115 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid Lixian Chen for MATH115; the , and no usable study support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesLanguage BarrierPassive-Aggressive GradingUnresponsiveAvoid
  • Students report she ignores questions and goes off on tangents
  • as passive-aggressive with almost no study material
  • Language barrier makes already hard MATH115 much worse

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

and almost no study material make earning a high grade extremely difficult.

All evidence is from one in-person MATH115 review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Student rated difficulty 5 and described confusing, off-topic teaching that blocks understanding.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Student calls her the and details multiple serious classroom failures.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Described as ridiculously passive-aggressive on grading with little support for students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Little assigned study material is provided, but the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Goes on tangents, answers wrong questions, ignores students, and has a major language barrier.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

; and lack of study material imply exam-centric risk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One harsh MATH115 review says lectures are off-topic, questions go unanswered, grading is passive-aggressive, and study material is nearly nonexistent.

Main concern

Language barrier plus unhelpful answers leave students without a path to succeed.

What students said

“This teacher is by far the . She goes off on tangents and doesn't listen to her students.”
MATH115
“She's ridiculously passive-aggressive and provides nearly no material to study.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but and no study material make assessment feel strict and opaque.

Little Study MaterialUnclear Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person MATH115 ; it does report almost no material to study and .

Nearly no study materialPassive-aggressive grading
“provides nearly no material to study”
MATH115
“She's ridiculously passive-aggressive ”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is by far the . She goes off on tangents and doesn't listen to her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person MATH115 , and language barrier. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“This teacher is by far the . She goes off on tangents and doesn't listen to her students.”

🚫

5/100

“Several times throughout the semester when she was asked a question she answered something completely different.”

⚖️

12/100

“She's ridiculously passive-aggressive and provides nearly no material to study.”

🗣️ Language Barrier

10/100

“Huge language barrier”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes off on tangents and doesn't listen to her students
  • answered something completely different
  • Huge language barrier

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ridiculously passive-aggressive
  • provides nearly no material to study

Theme 3

⚠️ Red Flags

  • by far the
  • doesn't listen to her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but very negative 2016 review; yet sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values