AI Rate Professor

History

Johnny Gonzales

HIST106 · HIST102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will read the book carefully and ; otherwise look for another history option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing history profBook-heavy examsDaily quizzes riskEngaging group talkSlow on email
  • One strong positive HIST106 review praises engagement and light work; two HIST102 reviews warn of hard book-based tests and poor communication.
  • and can have very low averages.
  • Experience depends heavily on course section and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student earned an A with reasonable quizzes, but others report brutal test averages and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is manageable if you read, but testing is detailed and book-driven rather than lecture-driven, which raises intellectual and study load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a , so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

One glowing review and poor responsiveness.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Low test averages and tough daily .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and heavy textbook note-taking.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Engaging and story-driven for some; , and unresponsive for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students stress tests and on textbook detail.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student found him engaging with reasonable work, while , and unresponsive email.

Main concern

and can average very low; communication and consistency feel unreliable.

What students said

“He interacts with the class & actually engages with his students so its easy to pay attention.”
HIST106
“Lectures are maybe 2% of test. Rest comes out of the book.”
HIST102
“ . unless and tests where the average score is a 26/50.”
HIST102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one review notes group open-note tests, but overall difficulty still feels high.

Book-based testsGroup open-note testsDaily quizzesDetailed factual questions

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; group open-note testing is mentioned once, alongside harsh quiz and test averages.

Book-based testsGroup open-note testsDaily quizzes
“ .”
HIST102
“tests where the average score is a 26/50.”
HIST102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“would not reccommend.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2010-2015, . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Book Over Lectures

35/100

“Lectures are maybe 2% of test. Rest comes out of the book.”

⚠️

28/100

“tests where the average score is a 26/50.”

😄 Engaging Side

75/100

“Professor Gonzales is a great teacher! He interacts with the class & actually engages with his students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He interacts with the class & actually engages with his students
  • Tries to relate to students
  • I never dreaded going to his class because he lets the students discuss in groups

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lectures are maybe 2% of test. Rest comes out of the book.
  • and tests where the average score is a 26/50
  • The reasonable amount.

Theme 3

✉️ About Communication

  • loses emails and
  • would not reccommend.
  • this teacher is a jerk! should be fired from teaching!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2010-2015 with sharply conflicting tones and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST1022 reviews
HIST1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values