AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Lorraine Peterson

ACCT106 · ACCT105 · ACCT122 · ACCT107 · ACCT101 · ACCT201 · ACCT115 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if ; lectures often add little and newer reviews warn against her.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-learning classUnorganized lecturesEasy A possibleDry deliveryHelpful when engaged
  • early fans praise fairness and help, and confusing.
  • Many lower-level ACCT courses are easy A with , and light structure.
  • Attendance is often not mandatory; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students report easy A , and light projects if you complete the work.

Easy-A claims ; the one online review did not address grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is generally manageable for intro accounting, though some courses feel dry or .

Difficulty ratings and easy-class comments are driven by in-person reviews; online sample is too small.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Several comments and lectures sometimes feel pointless.

; online does not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Older reviews recommend her for fairness and help, but later reviews .

Online review is firmly negative; in-person opinion is polarized by course and year.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students , and easy A outcomes when work is completed.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is almost all in-person; online review .

Workload

Light

72/100

Typical load is a , and one project; some tax courses require more work than unit count suggests.

Format shift

Workload details come mainly from in-person ACCT115-style courses.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students find her knowledgeable and helpful, but .

Format shift

In-person reviews are split; the sole online review is strongly negative on communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

; payroll and tax classes emphasize assignments plus a small number of tests.

Format shift

Assessment details are from in-person reviews; online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

older ACCT115/107 reviews praise fair grading and help, while ACCT201 and some early courses call her unprepared, dry, and ineffective.

Main concern

Lectures ; many treat it as a self-learning class.

What students said

“Definitely a self-learning class with this teacher.”
ACCT201
“Easy A class, professor is very helpful and nice”
ACCT115
“2 tests, both open book. If you don't get an A in her class you must not have done any work.”
ACCT115

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and .

Main concern

Does not communicate and online tools feel chaotic.

What students said

“Doesn't communicate with students in her online class. Cengage was a horrible program to use. Unorganized.”
115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

limited test count and low pressure when students do the assigned work.

Open BookFew ExamsTest Curves

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional curves on hard problems.

Open Book2 ExamsCurves
“2 tests, both open book.”
ACCT115
“ if enough people have trouble with the same problems”
ACCT115

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely a self-learning class with this teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in person), highlighting teaching inconsistency and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

48/100

“Definitely a self-learning class with this teacher.”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

82/100

“Easy A class, professor is very helpful and nice”

🗂️ Organization Gaps

35/100

“ and lost. She knows about accounting, but struggles to teach it.”

⚖️ Fair When Engaged

78/100

“She is very fair, requires a very reasonable workload and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Definitely a self-learning class with this teacher.
  • Nice lady, but horrible teacher. and lost.
  • Terrifyingly dry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A class, professor is very helpful and nice
  • 2 tests, both open book.
  • Attend class, and it's an easy A.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication & Support

  • Doesn't communicate with students in her online class.
  • If I ask a question .
  • Very knowledgable, fair, and eager to help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

17 reviews give decent volume, but they span 2008-2015 with polarized quality and almost no recent online detail.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1158 reviews
ACCT1072 reviews
ACCT2012 reviews
1151 review
ACCT1011 review
Show 3 more courses
ACCT1051 review
ACCT1061 review
ACCT1221 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1