AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Linda Amador

PSYCH125 · SOC125 · PSYC125 · SOC102 · SOC101 · SOC100 · SOC1962 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

unless you only need an easy grade and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing LecturesOpinion HeavyEasy Grading For SomeTalks Down To StudentsAvoid Warnings
  • Majority call her rude, biased, disorganized, or the .
  • A minority find her sweet, easy, and grade-lenient with light work.
  • Expect , and uneven quiz fairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Several students report easy grades, , and A-level marks even when learning felt low, though .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content load is often light and , but .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most detailed reviews warn students to stay away despite a few positive easy-class notes.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Some say she grades easy and may barely read papers, while and fail-prone.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly short papers or service options can be light, but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is poor teaching, bias, and disrespect, with only a minority finding her great.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of papers, presentations, online quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and poor teaching, plus a minority who call it easy and sweet.

Main concern

Students report rude tone, opinion-driven lectures, and unfair or subjective quizzes.

What students said

“She is honestly the life.”
SOC100
“ from her class”
PSYC125
“ !Im in .”
SOC100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention online quizzes, papers, presentations, and .

Online QuizzesEssay FinalPresentationOpinion Based Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

end-term paper, presentation, and essay final.

Online Quizzes5 Page PaperPresentationEssay Final
“The subjective.”
SOC100
“A presentation, 5 pg paper, and a the semester.”
SOC100
“ same day.”
SOC100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY FROM THIS PROFESSOR. You have been warned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews, highlighting strong avoid warnings balanced against easy-grade comments. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“This is the entire life.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“Amador is a terrible teacher, and .”

📗 Easy Grade Paradox

72/100

“Easy A, gives , do yourself a favor, find another teacher”

⚠️ Bias Concern

30/100

“She pushes her personal philosophy and feminist beliefs while simultaneously insulting the beliefs of others.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You won't learn anything in this class.
  • She chooses to teach her own opinions rather than teaching factual information from the book.
  • Horrible teacher. Period.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • One of the easiest classes I've taken.
  • She grades easy.
  • Super sweet and really easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She's extremely rude
  • talks down to students like children
  • treating students as elementary children.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with and strong language, but opinions split and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

SOC1007 reviews
PSYC1251 review
PSYCH1251 review
SOC1011 review
SOC1021 review
Show 2 more courses
SOC1251 review
SOC19621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values