AI Rate Professor

Graphic Communication

Patty Tait

GCMW102 · ROPGC260 · RGC26039594PO · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

and portfolio building if you can follow directions and keep up with project work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGenerous and organizedHelpful with design toolsPortfolio focusedClear lectures with lab timeInflexible on late work
  • , and strong for portfolio and design software skills.
  • One older , and inflexible policies.
  • and web skills and can handle portfolio deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

One student earned an A and recent difficulty ratings are low, but portfolio work still requires real effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and in-class lab time that make web and design skills approachable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though lab time in class is highlighted as useful.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Two solid positive reviews outweigh one harsh older complaint for most design-focused students.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students call her generous and report an A, though one review says she is inflexible on designs.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Portfolio projects, software practice, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Most comments praise clarity, organization, and skill coaching, with one strong unprofessionalism complaint.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on portfolios, design projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and portfolio skill growth, with one older review warning about late major assignments and inflexibility.

Main concern

and inflexible design or finance rules.

What students said

“ , and fun.”
RGC26039594PO
“The and .”
GCMW102
“Last minute of the semester to give out the .”
ROPGC260

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize portfolio and .

Portfolio projectsFinal major assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence points to portfolio and .

Portfolio requiredFinal major assignments
“Patty helped me create a good portfolio and improve my skills in Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign”
RGC26039594PO
“Last minute of the semester to give out the .”
ROPGC260

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, balancing skill praise against inflexibility concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“The and .”

🧰 Skill Building

75/100

“Patty helped me create a good portfolio and improve my skills in Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign”

⚠️ Policy Friction

35/100

“Very inflexable on designs and student finances. Treats adults like children.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and fun
  • very helpful and
  • gave plenty of

Theme 2

📁

  • helped me create a good portfolio
  • Last minute of the semester to give out the
  • Doesn't accept word documents on blackboard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews spanning 2005-2014 with mixed detail give a usable but not high-confidence picture.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GCMW1021 review
RGC26039594PO1 review
ROPGC2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values