AI Rate Professor

English

Jordan Molina

ENG202 · ENG203 · ENG100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want an and can handle regular writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly organizedEssay heavyAllows revisionsPassionate discussionsHard but fair grader
  • Most students call her organized, passionate, and one of the .
  • Writing load can be heavy, with frequent essays and in-class work.
  • , but doing daily work leads to good grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Doing assignments and revisions can yield an A, but she is a and writing volume is real.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is often called interesting and not too difficult, though .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

; others say it is mandatory or needed for journal checks.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Seven of eight reviews strongly praise her; one student strongly warns against the heavy rigid workload.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Described as a and allows essay revisions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Regular writing, journals, and sometimes weekly multi-page essays make the load moderate to heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and excellent at explaining writing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and revisions more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly praise organization, passion, and complaint about rigid weekly multi-page essays.

Main concern

Heavy writing load and limited schedule flexibility for some students.

What students said

“the first class she told you everything you need to do to get an A.”
ENG100
“She has an and they are normally 5 pages.”
ENG202
“ ”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-focused with an in-class essay midterm and .

In-class essay midtermEasy final paperEssay revisionsLimited formal exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, journal checks, and an easy final paper.

In-class essay midtermEssay revisionsJournal checksEasy final paper
“In class essay midterm and . Highly recommended! ”
ENG100
“A large amount of writing, but most in class.”
ENG202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AMAZING - Probably one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting organization, writing load, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“AMAZING - Probably one of the . She is insanely intelligent and .”

📝 Writing Load

42/100

“She has an and they are normally 5 pages.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ ! ”

⚖️

58/100

“she's a but not unfair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ! You come to class knowing exactly what you'll be doing.
  • she is very enthusiastic and gets
  • shows interest in students opinions and encourages free thinkning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Should be an easy class to get an A if .
  • she's a but not unfair.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • A large amount of writing, but most in class.
  • She has an and they are normally 5 pages.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews with mostly consistent praise and one sharp negative outlier provide a solid but not large sample from 2010-2014.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENG2023 reviews
ENG2031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values