AI Rate Professor

English

Allison St Dennis

ENG100AND202 · ENG101 · ENG098 · ENG · ENG100 · ENG50 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will write seriously and ; expect real work, not an easy coast.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExpectationsStrong Feedback on PapersCritical Thinking FocusEngaging DiscussionsEssay-Heavy
  • Nearly all students , and real writing growth.
  • Course is essay-driven and moderately challenging, not a free ride.
  • One outlier calls her condescending and boring, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students say you must try and write seriously, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content challenges students with critical thinking and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

One detailed review says she is lenient with attendance; others do not describe strict roll call.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students call her one of the best English teachers and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

; effort on writing matters more than free curves.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Roughly six to seven essays and meaningful handouts create steady writing work without extreme overload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and real writing growth.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on multiple papers, comments, and drafts rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English students , and growth-focused, with essay load and critical thinking as the core experience.

Main concern

and one report of a condescending tone.

What students said

“St. Dennis was a fantastic teacher! She made the information very understandable. The .”
ENG50
“absolutely loved her! she was very interesting and enjoyable. provided good comments on papers.”
ENG100
“there's a lot of paper writing, but .”
ENG100AND202
“Very condescending, which even shows itself in her writing. Boring class.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Work is paper-heavy; one student notes taking a , but .

Essay FocusFinal Mentioned Once

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence centers on essays and .

Multiple EssaysFinal Flexibility Mentioned
“ so I could give birth on class night, so that .”
ENG100
“There was around 7 essays throughout the semester, which sounds like a lot, but wasn't to bad.”
ENG50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to have a great semester with an excellent English teacher you should take her class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person , and fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Great Teacher. .”

📝 Feedback Strength

88/100

“provided good comments on papers. really helped in any way she could.”

⚖️

70/100

“there's a lot of paper writing, but .”

⚠️ Outlier Critique

30/100

“Very condescending, which even shows itself in her writing. Boring class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made the information very understandable.
  • and .
  • very spirited woman.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Challenges you yet is not a very hard class you have to try at least.
  • there's a lot of paper writing, but .
  • forces her students to think critically

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • never makes you feel stupid and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but most are older and grade data is scarce.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1009 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENG502 reviews
ENG1 review
ENG0981 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG100AND2021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1