AI Rate Professor

Radio and Television

Peter Jacoby

RTV · ENG205 · FUNLOVING · DRAFT7 · RTV100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want industry stories and can learn independently; avoid if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProIndustry InsiderPolarizingStorytellerHelpful To SomeMixed Teaching Skill
  • Reviews split hard between excellent industry mentor and ineffective teacher.
  • Strong on real-world TV and media stories when students connect with him.
  • Beginners can feel dismissed; teaching clarity is the main risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some call him easy yet strict and , so an A needs steady work not zero effort.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings sit moderate-low and several students describe the class as easy or fun, with uneven challenge by course.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a , so .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

while half say he has no business teaching.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

as clear and revision-friendly, without a strong lenient or harsh consensus.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Comments focus more on ; workload appears moderate.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Four glowing reviews on knowledge and humor are offset by three harsh reviews on teaching ability.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Papers and class review of texts are mentioned, but overall assessment mix is not fully detailed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person RTV and related classes feel industry-rich and fun for fans, but polarizing for students who find his teaching style alienating.

Main concern

Some students say he knows TV but cannot teach or encourage beginners.

What students said

“He's easy, yet strict. But and again!”
RTV
“A guy that knows his stuff about TV but has no business teaching.”
RTV100
“ and clear.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, so exam friendliness stays standard overall.

Paper RevisionsIn-Class Text Review

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students note and thorough text review; proctoring and .

Paper RevisionsIn-Class Text Review
“ and clear. If you make the changes, your revised paper will get a better grade.”
ENG205

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A guy that knows his stuff about TV but has no business teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 polarized in-person reviews, highlighting industry strength versus teaching complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

📺 Industry Knowledge

75/100

“This man is very full of information, has worked all side of the industry”

💥 Teaching Polarization

50/100

“This guy has no business teaching!”

📝

70/100

“ and clear.”

⚖️ Depends On Fit

48/100

“He's easy, yet strict. But and again!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always has an interesting story to tell
  • has no idea as to how to share his knowledge
  • great sense of humor and always keeps things interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's easy, yet strict
  • If you make the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • helpful and understanding individual
  • started looking at me like an outsider
  • insufferably liberal world view can be tough to stomach

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven old reviews (2003-2013) with extreme split opinions and limited grade detail reduce reliability.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

RTV1003 reviews
DRAFT71 review
ENG2051 review
FUNLOVING1 review
RTV1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values