Janice Schultz

HE165 · FCS165 · FCS185 · HE165NUTRITION · BIO185 · FCS150 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 38/100
RMP rating: 3.1/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you can self-manage strict deadlines and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear grading criteriaDeadline-strict quizzesMixed online-style feedbackPrompt feedback but coldPolarizing nutrition instructor

and straightforward chapter-quiz structure work for some self-directed students.
Multiple students slam ambiguous quiz wording and .
Tone can feel detached in BlackBoard-style formats with little inspiration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report docking for not matching her preferred answer style and harsh deadline penalties even when work is completed.

All evidence treated as in-person per input flags, though some comments describe online-style work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Reading and quizzes are manageable for some, but .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; deadline compliance matters more than seat time.

No clear attendance policy in the seven in-person-flagged reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Some enjoy the structure and positivity while others and grading.

Mixed .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and enforces harsh deadline penalties.

Format shift

Based on in-person-flagged reviews that often describe online-style assignments.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of reading, quizzes, and discussion posts with painful outcomes if deadlines are missed.

Format shift

Based on in-person-flagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and occasional warmth, but and motivation low.

Format shift

Based on in-person-flagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Chapter reading, quizzes, discussion boards, and a .

Format shift

Based on in-person-flagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and easy discussion boards, others report bad quiz design, deadline penalties, and uninspiring delivery.

Main concern

Ambiguous multi-choice quizzes and work is done.

What students said

“Quizzes are very poorly written and multi-choice answers are and online research.”
FCS185

“Lots of work if you miss the deadlines even if you do the work you will get a bad grade.”
HE165

“I loved this class and learned a lot. I liked how she was always positive.”
FCS150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on quizzes and deadline-driven online-style work; friendliness is reduced by ambiguous items.

QuizzesDiscussion boardsPosted finalDeadline-driven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe chapter quizzes, discussion boards, and a .

QuizzesDiscussion boardsPosted finalDeadline-driven

“it was straightforward read the chapter do the and fun”
FCS185

“ and multi-choice answers are ambiguous”
FCS185

“ . Due by 18th. Good Luck”
HE165NUTRITION

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Quizzes are very poorly written and multi-choice answers are and online research.”
Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person-flagged reviews, highlighting grading opacity, deadlines, and mixed tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I liked the class, and could tell she made an effort to be friendly and inviting.”

⚖️

28/100

“She has a specific way she wants a question answered, and even if you put a .”

⏰ Deadline Pressure

35/100

“Lots of work if you miss the deadlines even if you do the work you will get a bad grade.”

👎 Recommendation Split

42/100

“this one I do not reccomend. The formar of her class does not work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

prompt in getting back to me on e-mails and provided feedback
always positive

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

and multi-choice answers are ambiguous
Not an easy class

Theme 3

📋 About Course Format

read the chapter do the and fun
Keep up with the deadlines
Weigh carefully what you want out of a BlackBoard Class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2006-2012 and deadlines but are dated and polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52

4 out of 51

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

FCS1852 reviews

BIO1851 review

FCS1501 review

FCS1651 review

HE1651 review

Show 1 more courses

HE165NUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Janice Schultz

x x if you can self-manage strict deadlines and x x x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Varies

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

⏰ Deadline Pressure

👎 Recommendation Split

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

📋 About Course Format

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can self-manage strict deadlines and .

⚖️