AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Foelber

PHIL101 · PHIL100 · PHIL110 · PHIL102 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you show up for study-guide reviews.

Best fit · Easy A HunterStudy-guide examsEasy A curvePassionate lecturerNo homeworkDiscussion-driven
  • .
  • Passionate discussion-style philosophy teaching with .
  • most students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Tests match study guides, homework is basically none, and a .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

and study guides that simplify harder ideas.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

, but showing up especially on study-guide days boosts grades.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students , and a professor they would take again.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

very attainable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

; assessment is three study-guide-based tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Passionate, clear, discussion-focused teaching that students call fantastic.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Course grade rests .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person intro philosophy with , and enthusiastic lectures.

Main concern

but discussion and study-guide days matter for the A.

What students said

“ identical to the study guides, no reason not to get an a.”
PHIL100
“Textbook not really needed bc he goes over everything in class.”
PHIL100
“Also grades on a curve in his 100 classes, which is nice because basically it means you won't get worse than a C.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and feel very student-friendly.

Study-guide examsThree testsCurve on intro classes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and are widely called easy to ace.

Study-guide examsThree testsCurve on intro classes
“ , no reason not to get an a.”
PHIL100
“He gives effective study guides and goes over them to ensure everyone understands the material prior to the test.”
PHIL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ identical to the study guides, no reason not to get an a.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 and passionate teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Foelber is an awesome philosophy teacher! He is passionate about philosophy and wants his students to succeed!”

🅰️ Easy A Path

88/100

“ identical to the study guides, no reason not to get an a.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

90/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Lightness

92/100

“Also really didn't need the book because the study guide covers the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • passionate about philosophy and wants his students to succeed
  • and able to dumb down the more complicated stuff
  • really wanted class discussions and student input

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • grades on a curve in his 100 classes
  • no reason not to get an a

Theme 3

❤️ About Class Vibe

  • This dude was chill
  • class discussion made people think
  • Made class very enjoyable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly detailed reviews are consistent but all date from 2008-2012 with one empty comment.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1014 reviews
PHIL1003 reviews
PHIL1021 review
PHIL1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values