AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Scott Wallihan

CSEE · CSE4110 · CSIS130 · CSCI222 · CSIS225 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the material and only need a credential.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedPoor FeedbackKnows Stuff But Can't TeachRudeInconsistent
  • Most students report poor preparation, weak curriculum, and little help.
  • One older review praises real-world experience and after-class support.
  • is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One student said the semester was graded ; overall A-ease is not strongly proven.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

structured while content difficulty is moderate.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

No online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most and support, with only one strong positive outlier.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

At least one course was graded overly easily despite difficult assignments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments can be hard and late-prepared; workload is uneven rather than light.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated reports of , and weak topic mastery dominate one older glowing review.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Students emphasize assignments and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CIS/CS reviews mostly describe unprepared lectures, rude tone, and ; one early review calls him awesome and experienced.

Main concern

Curriculum and instructor preparation are repeatedly called poor.

What students said

“The teacher was poorly prepared and was not particularly interested in helping the students.”
CSIS130
“Wallihan was horrendous. He .NET”
CSE4110
“Scott is an awesome instructor. He has lots of experience”
CSIS225

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

comments.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I do not recommend this class or Scott Wallihan as a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting unprepared teaching with one strong positive. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“The teacher was poorly prepared and was not particularly interested in helping the students.”

📧

20/100

“ , and does not make his deadlines.”

👍 Positive Outlier

75/100

“Stays after class as long as it takes for his students to understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • curriculum was poorly prepared
  • frantically flipping through a book
  • We learned more from his chatting than teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the semester was graded overly easily

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The teacher was rude to the students
  • Scott is an awesome instructor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five older reviews with strong polarity and limited grade or .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CSCI2221 review
CSE41101 review
CSEE1 review
CSIS1301 review
CSIS2251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values