AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Paula Adams

ACCT110 · BUS110 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

and find another accounting instructor if you can.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely disorganizedConfusing lecturesImpatient with questionsTake-home test errorsStudents teaching each other
  • Near-unanimous reports of disorganization, syllabus changes, and
  • Rude or impatient tone and weak answers leave students stuck
  • and and sudden large assignments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Wrong , and weak instruction make an A require heavy outside help.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material feels harder because lectures confuse students and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Almost every and calls her among the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report no credit for and rigid grading of alternate methods.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

and little class lab time create heavy outside load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and unable to explain problems.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and software work dominate more than classic in-class exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students describe chaotic in-person accounting classes with poor organization, , and .

Main concern

Disorganization and wrong test can tank grades even when you try hard.

What students said

“ . .”
ACCT110
“ . Syllabus changed after 6 wks into course”
BUS110
“she gave us a check number so we would know if we were accurate... she told us the check number was wrong -- but she didn't give credit”
ACCT110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and projects that students say are poorly keyed and timed.

Take-home testsCheck-number keys (sometimes wrong)Large projects

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

wrong, and large projects appeared with little notice.

Take-home testsIncorrect check numbersSudden large projects
“On our first take home test, she gave us a check number... she told us the check number was wrong -- but she didn't give credit”
ACCT110
“She randomly assigned large projects, then didn't allow enough time to complete them.”
ACCT110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the worst teacher at Palomar. and treats people like property. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews from 2006-2008, highlighting disorganization and unfair assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

📋 Organization

15/100

“ . Syllabus changed after 6 wks into course”

⚖️

18/100

“she told us the check number was wrong -- but she didn't give credit for the mistake.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very inconsitent. Bad communication skills
  • Students went up to the board to figure out other students questions instead of her teaching
  • nice lady, but has no business teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you try to go it alone, you are flirting with disaster
  • she spends all of the class lecturing on pointless topics which didn't allow for
  • get a tutor

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • rude and treats people like property
  • Very impatient with challenging questions
  • Has a BIG problem with students doing problems different ways even w/ correct answers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine highly consistent negative reviews from 2006-2008 provide clear detail, but the sample is older and modest in size.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ACCT1107 reviews
BUS1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values