AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Raguel Jacob-Almeida

SOC200 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear TestsOff-Topic VideosTextbook HeavyPoor TeachingAvoid
  • Student calls her the and .
  • Class content and .
  • Students feel forced to read the whole textbook and guess the exam.
  • suitableStudentType

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting a good grade seems hard because tests feel unpredictable and lectures .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty is rated moderate, but confusion around test content makes the experience harder than the number alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Student and rates quality at 1.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and and opaque.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students must read the whole textbook and still guess what appears on tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Review says she knows nothing about teaching and confuses the class about tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Test content and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person SOC200 felt disorganized with tests that did not match class focus.

Main concern

Misaligned lectures, videos, and .

What students said

“ . she knows nothing about teaching and made the whole class question what was on the test.”
SOC200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams feel disconnected from class videos and discussion, forcing textbook guessing.

Unclear Test CoverageTextbook Dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as unclear and poorly aligned with lectures.

Unclear Test CoverageOff-Topic Class Content
“she shows videos that have nothing to do with the section, and talks about material not on the test!you have to read the whole textbook and guess whats on the test”
SOC200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . she knows nothing about teaching and made the whole class question what was on the test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting poor teaching alignment and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ . she knows nothing about teaching”

📝 Test Confusion

30/100

“made the whole class question what was on the test”

📚 Textbook Guesswork

28/100

“you have to read the whole textbook and guess whats on the test”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she knows nothing about teaching
  • shows videos that have nothing to do with the section

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • made the whole class question what was on the test
  • talks about material not on the test
  • read the whole textbook and guess whats on the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Single highly negative 2012 review provides a but limited breadth.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values