AI Rate Professor

English

Anne Hohman

ENG10 · ENGLIENGL · ENG250 · ENGSAAA · ENGLEC · ENGL210 · BRITLIT · ENG110 · ENGEN10 · ENG50 · ENG210 · ENG211 · ENG203 · ENG202 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do the reading and want a ; skip her if you want hand-holding or an easy ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDiscussion DrivenClear ExpectationsLots of ReadingSarcastic HumorWork for Your Grade
  • Many students praise her as a clear, lively, discussion-focused English teacher who builds real writing skill.
  • A vocal minority finds her hard, sarcastic, or unsupportive and says you largely teach yourself.
  • , and participation more than through easy curves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students repeatedly say you work for the , and critical thinking, and some find good marks hard to earn.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from fun and - and writing-heavy with real intellectual demand.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Attendance is not always strictly taken, but and class value.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and engagement, tempered by a minority of harsh negative experiences.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

as straightforward but not soft; she can detect BS and expects real effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Many comments cite lots of reading, writing, discussion prep, and critical thinking work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

A , and highly effective, while some call her confusing, rude, or the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and midterms rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and writing; many love her clarity and energy, while some report harsh tone and self-directed struggle.

Main concern

Workload and sarcasm can feel heavy if .

What students said

“She was kept on topic and worked with you to bring about true discussion on the .”
ENG210
“She does make you work for your grade.”
ENG10
“ and over and ”
ENG202
“She expects you to learn on your own.”
ENGLEC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are generally doable if you keep up with reading and discussion; and limited quizzes.

Reading-based testsEssay writingDiscussion-relevant midtermFew easy quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and class discussion, with mostly writing-based assessments and some easy early quizzes.

Reading-based testsEssay writingDiscussion-relevant midterm
“ as long as you've done the reading and have come to class.”
ENG210
“ questions.”
ENG250
“ and over and ”
ENG202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Anne is an amazing teacher. Learned so much and grew as a writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Anne is the . and made it fun.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“A lot of reading and writing so if you can't stand English like me I'd steer away from her.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

42/100

“She does make you work for your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“ and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and made it fun
  • If you have a sarcastic sense of humor, you'll get along with her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does make you work for your grade
  • Her class was a lot of critical thinking, writing and reading
  • as long as you've done the reading

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • She expects you to learn on your own
  • Horrible. and teacher I have ever had
  • VERY sarcastic and often comes across as being rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews across many years and courses show consistent themes about discussion teaching and .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG104 reviews
ENG2104 reviews
ENG2503 reviews
ENG2022 reviews
ENG2032 reviews
Show 11 more courses
BRITLIT1 review
ENG1001 review
ENG1031 review
ENG1101 review
ENG2111 review
ENG501 review
ENGEN101 review
ENGL2101 review
ENGLEC1 review
ENGLIENGL1 review
ENGSAAA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values