AI Rate Professor

Health

Janice Shultz

FCS165 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless required; the and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh GraderStrict AttendanceMixed ClarityNot Flexible
  • Only one review exists, so confidence is low.
  • Student describes her as but a .
  • Missing class is treated strictly even with a good reason.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The only review calls her a , so an A likely takes strict, careful work.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty is moderate and is easy or advanced.

Based solely on the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

She is described as reason.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Student says she is not the best and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Explicitly called a .

Format shift

From the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, so workload is treated as average by default.

Format shift

No workload detail beyond the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

She tries to ensure understanding but and rigidity.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does not specify whether .

Format shift

No format split; only one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One FCS165 review paints her as but harsh on grades and strict about absences.

Main concern

and little understanding about missing class.

What students said

“she is a , and is not understanding about missing class, even if you have a good reason.”
FCS165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

overall.

“she is a , and is not understanding about missing class, even if you have a good reason.”
FCS165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is not the best and not the worst. She tries to make sure you understand the material, but she is a , and if you have a good reason.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

20/100

“she is a ”

📅

18/100

“ if you have a good reason”

📘 Mixed Teaching

40/100

“She tries to make sure you understand the material”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades & Policy

  • not understanding about missing class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • not the best and not the worst
  • tries to make sure you understand the material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2012 review with limited detail makes the profile thin and fragile.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FCS1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values