AI Rate Professor

English

Barbara Hohman

ENG202 · ENG210 · ENGENG · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already like English and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh English teacherHard papersStraightforward testsMakes students hate EnglishMidterms and essays
  • Several students call her teaching awful and say the class increases dislike of English.
  • Workload and and critical thinking demands.
  • One review notes straightforward tests without tricks and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Hard class reports and failed outcomes despite studying suggest an A requires heavy effort with uncertain payoff.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students describe the class as very hard with demanding critical thinking and papers.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Most comments warn students away, especially if they already dislike English.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report struggling despite study effort; and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

for English courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Comments emphasize unhelpful lessons and a demotivating classroom tone more than clarity.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grade is driven by midterms and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

: hard papers, high difficulty, and little perceived support.

Main concern

Students report the course makes them dislike English more and is hard even with heavy studying.

What students said

“Awful teacher who's primary goal is to rather make her students dislike English and the idea of critical thinking instead of being informative and and papers.”
ENG202
“The overall and 2-3 3pg essays. She is very straight forward and doesn't try .”
ENG210
“Terrible teacher. It was a very hard class and I studied so much but couldn't make it.”
ENG202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on midterms and short essays; .

MidtermsShort essaysNo trick questions

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and 2-3 short essays; tests are described as straightforward by one student.

Midterms2-3 page essaysStraightforward tests
“The overall and 2-3 3pg essays. She is very straight forward and doesn't try .”
ENG210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awful teacher who's primary goal is to rather make her students dislike English and the idea of critical thinking instead of being informative and and papers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting difficulty and negative teaching tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Awful teacher who's primary goal is to rather make her students dislike English”

📉 Difficulty

24/100

“It was a very hard class and I studied so much but couldn't make it.”

👍 Recommendation

26/100

“If you because you will hate english even more.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awful teacher who's primary goal is to rather make her students dislike English
  • Terrible teacher.
  • She is very straight forward and doesn't try .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was a very hard class and I studied so much but couldn't make it.
  • The overall and 2-3 3pg essays.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and no grade data limit confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG2022 reviews
ENG2101 review
ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values