AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cassondra Brown

MATHMATH · MATH170 · MATH115 · MATH15 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH10 · MATH50 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Do not take her class unless you already excel at math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh zero-tolerance gradingHuge homework loadGlosses over explanationsNo curveStrict syllabus rules
  • Most students say , and leaves them to learn from the book.
  • and missing even one graded problem can zero the whole set.
  • A few students who follow every rule report success, but the majority strongly advise dropping her class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

, and zero-tolerance homework grading make a high grade unrealistic for most.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Even lower-level math is treated as much harder than expected because teaching skips needed steps.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

and following directions, while absences are not the main failure mode.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The large majority call her the and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and incomplete or unstapled homework can receive a full zero.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report and countless problems never covered in class.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Common complaints are rushed lectures, skipped solution steps, and little willingness to help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Heavy homework and than the assigned work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math courses are described as and tests exceed homework difficulty.

Main concern

and weak explanations crush students who need guided teaching.

What students said

“TRUST US!!! save !!”
MATH10
“She assigns unbelievable amount of homework.”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are much harder than homework and combine with .

Tests harder than homeworkNo curveStrict homework zerosHigh drop rate

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading is unforgiving with .

Tests harder than homeworkNo curveHarsh partial zeros
“The are much much harder.”
MATH50
“ .”
MATH115
“if you miss a single problem out of 5 chapters worth of .”
MATH170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 and teaching gaps. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“she blows throw her lesson and .”

📚

12/100

“She assigns unbelievable amount of homework.”

⚖️

12/100

“If decides to grade, you will get a zero for that assignment.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“TRUST US!!! save !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wouldn't state how got an answer that she did on the board
  • glosses over chapters
  • rambles on incomprehensibly during class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 1/2 the class dropped
  • received a D- and was still top 5 in the class
  • Re-took it with another teacher and got an A!!!

Theme 3

📋 About Rules & Workload

  • forgot to staple it and she gave us 0 credit
  • Be neat, come to class prepared
  • do LOTS of work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

16 consistent in-person reviews across multiple math courses and weak teaching.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH604 reviews
MATH503 reviews
MATH102 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH152 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1151 review
MATH1701 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values