AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Kevin Staff

ESL35 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are motivated and want practical writing prep; skip if you need constant hand-holding.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient but firmPrepares writing skillsNot for unmotivated students
  • Prepares students with practical simple writing for future classes
  • Patient enough but does not suffer fools gladly
  • Success-oriented students liked him; weaker students did not

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

No grade data and one review; success students liked him, so an A likely needs real effort rather than free credit.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rated 4 with practical writing tasks that filter motivated versus unmotivated students.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Quality 4 with praise for preparation and patience, tempered by a firm style some students dislike.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; outcomes seem to track student effort.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Mentions varied simple writing tasks without describing heavy load.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Prepares useful writing and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Review focuses on writing preparation rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One older in-person review describes practical writing prep, firm expectations, and split student reaction by effort level.

Main concern

Single old review limits confidence; unmotivated students may dislike the tone.

What students said

“He prepared us with diferent kinds simple writing for future. Bad students didn't like, success students liked.”
ESL35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He prepared us with diferent kinds simple writing for future. Bad students didn't like, success students liked.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting preparation and firm style. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Style

70/100

“He doesn't "suffer fools gladly," but .”

📈 Who Thrives

65/100

“Bad students didn't like, success students liked.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He prepared us with diferent kinds simple writing for future.
  • He doesn't "suffer fools gladly," but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Bad students didn't like, success students liked.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2011 with limited detail and no grade or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values