AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Lihe Chen

ESL36 · ESL101 · ESL131 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will show up and study hard; if you want a chill easy ESL class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ESL teacherDedicated but demandingMixed student effort blameNotebook-heavy gradingWould not always recommend
  • Reviews split hard between wonderful dedicated teaching and harsh or elementary methods.
  • Motivated learners say they learn a lot; others call him hard or so-so and .
  • and student effort rather than easy credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Supporters say you must try hard, while critics call him hard and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Some call ESL content learnable with effort, but others rate difficulty high and methods elementary or confusing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Comments criticize classmates who do not show up or study, implying presence and effort matter.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

About half praise deep learning while .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Critics say he is hard and grades depend heavily on dual notebooks with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Dedicated students must work hard and maintain two notebooks; it is not a free ride.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students learn a ton from a dedicated teacher, others find methods elementary or poorly rated.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Most of the grade is described as based on a dual notebook system rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ESL experiences range from wonderful dedicated instruction to elementary methods and .

Main concern

Highly polarized opinions and several low-quality hostile or vague comments.

What students said

“wonderful teacher, wonderful class! i learned a ton!”
ESL101
“Extremely dedicated teacher and works REALLY hard. It's up the students to work just as hard!”
ESL36
“Wouldn't recoment taking him.”
ESL131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize notebooks and ongoing .

Notebook-based grading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews highlight dual notebooks as central to grades and .

Dual notebook system
“Most of the grade is based in the dual notebook system, which means you have to keep 2 notebooks.”
ESL131

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely dedicated teacher and works REALLY hard. It's up the students to work just as hard!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, balancing glowing ESL praise against hardness and method complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Polarizing Teaching

52/100

“wonderful teacher, wonderful class! i learned a ton!”

📚 Effort Required

35/100

“It's up the students to work just as hard!”

👎

45/100

“Wouldn't recoment taking him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wonderful teacher, wonderful class! i learned a ton!
  • Extremely dedicated teacher and works REALLY hard.
  • many of his teaching methods are elementary school-like.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is hard. but ESL 101 wont be a hard class
  • Most of the grade is based in the dual notebook system
  • the others just need to try and to care for once!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight mostly in-person reviews from 2006-2010 show a but include several vague or hostile one-liners.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL1014 reviews
ESL363 reviews
ESL1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values