AI Rate Professor

English

Martin Woodside

ENG100 · ENGENG · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want useful critical thinking practice and can keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCritical ThinkingEssay HeavyHard GraderThought ProvokingDiscussion Based
  • and discussion skills.
  • No traditional tests; , and research with real effort required.
  • He grades fairly hard but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Essays and research can earn good grades with steady work, but he grades hard and punishes procrastination.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college-level English with real thinking demands, not a breeze for passive writers.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Students say showing up, listening, and participating matters for success and feedback.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most reviews call him a good or amazing teacher who builds .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Multiple students say he grades hard and will mark late or thin work more harshly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is manageable if planned, but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and real skill growth.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

No tests; , and a research paper.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG100 is discussion- and , though and a minority found him boring.

Main concern

and heavy writing can surprise students expecting an easy composition class.

What students said

“there were no tests just essays, the of research.”
ENG100
“Give him a chance and you'll leave the class with critical thinking skills useful in all life situations.”
ENG100
“He was a really good teacher and although he graded a little hard was willing to help in any way possible.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-centered with no traditional exams, which feels student-friendly if you can write.

No TestsEssay FinalResearch PaperGroup ProjectsDiscussion Focused

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ENG100 uses essays and research instead of .

No TestsEssay FinalResearch PaperWorkshops
“there were no tests just essays, the of research.”
ENG100
“Did 2 easy group projects and a .”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Give him a chance and you'll leave the class with critical thinking skills useful in all life situations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, , and skill growth. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He is an amazing teacher overall. I learned things that will really help me in the future.”

✍️ Essay Focus

86/100

“there were no tests just essays, the of research.”

⚖️

38/100

“Grades a bit hard. .”

👍

78/100

“He is fair and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he makes you think outside the box and try to make you be more open minded.
  • Really interesting conversations min class.
  • he's very good at aproaching arguments

Theme 2

📈 About Work and Grades

  • dont procrastinate bc he will know and grade it even harder
  • The workload is manageable if you stay on top of it and plan ahead.
  • An easy class, but grades fairly hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He had one on one meeting with the students twice in the semester which was really cool
  • was willing to help in any way possible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 mostly detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2009 are directionally consistent but limited in number and age.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1009 reviews
ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values