AI Rate Professor

English

Lesile Manville

ENGC1000 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderRudeUnorganizedUnclear GradingAvoid
  • Multiple students call her rude and say she ignores emails
  • and pop quizzes
  • All four reviewers earned B and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

All four earned B with and no path to easy A described.

All evidence is in-person ENGC1000.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Average difficulty around 3.5 with , and .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and comments .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; students get B with and few graded items.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Textbook-heavy with pop quizzes and group projects, but not described as .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

, and students walk out.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Pop quizzes, group projects, and limited graded items with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENGC1000 reviews consistently describe rude behavior, confusion, and .

Main concern

Rude interactions, ignored emails, and .

What students said

“do not have this professor, overall the ”
ENGC1000
“she is rude and until I took this class I have never voluntarily walked out of a class”
ENGC1000
“ .”
ENGC1000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Beware of pop quizzes and ; no student-friendly exam format mentioned.

Pop quizzesTough gradingGroup projects

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes and ; students struggle to recover missed in-class points.

Pop quizzesTough graderUnclear grading criteria
“Overall an unorganized teacher, and very strict on following the textbook.”
ENGC1000
“ .If you miss something she says in class, she can't explain it well enough later for you to understand”
ENGC1000

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“do not have this professor, overall the , they are just rude and it is clear they do not want to be around youn people.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting rudeness, confusion, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“do not have this professor, overall the ”

😠 Classroom Behavior

12/100

“she is rude and until I took this class I have never voluntarily walked out of a class because of a teachers behavior towards me until I had her.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .If you miss something she says in class, she can't explain it well enough later for you to understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • unorganized teacher
  • doesn't answer emails

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Beware of pop quizzes

Theme 3

😠 About Character

  • she is rude
  • do not want to be around youn people

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent low-quality in-person reviews over several months with matching grades and complaint themes.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGC10004 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values