AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gregory Morre

MATH1A · CALC1A · MATH1C · MATH150A · MATH9 · MATH16 · MATH25 · MATH1B · MATH2 · MATH15 · MATH151 · MATH10 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
32.81%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong self-driven math student ready for and unforgiving exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework AvalancheTough Exam GraderLecture MistakesHigh Drop RateMath Purist
  • Workload and ; .
  • Lectures often include mistakes and weak intuition, so .
  • A minority of hardcore learners praise accuracy standards and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

As happen for strong students, but harsh partial credit, long exams, and and uncertain.

; in-person has more detailed fail and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Average difficulty rating is high and students repeatedly call concepts, pacing, and exams extremely hard.

In-person calculus and MATH10 dominate the brain-burner signal; online MATH16 echoes the same.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and punctuality; some courses allow more flexibility but success still depends on being present.

; some online and selected courses list attendance no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and many run-away reviews outweigh praise from a smaller hardcore group.

In-person negativity is denser; online is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; small errors and missing key steps cost heavily on multi-page exams.

Format shift

Consistent across formats; a few note partial credit or .

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Written plus online homework often runs many hours weekly on top of quizams and exams.

Format shift

In-person reports 5-15 hour homework weeks most often; online also flags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Passionate about math but frequent lecture mistakes, uneven pacing, and .

Format shift

In-person has the strongest error and confusion complaints; a few online students found structure clearer.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Quizams, multi-page exams, and .

Format shift

; online MATH16 notes tests near half the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person calculus and transfer math feature slow or error-prone lectures, 5-15 hour homework weeks, and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity fails many students while grading and workload stay unforgiving.

What students said

“RUN AWAY IF YOU CAN!!”
MATH10
“Homework took 15+ hrs/week. Khan Academy taught me instead.”
MATH1C
“If your goal is to end the semester with a tangible increase in mastery of the subject matter, and are prepared to .”
Math25

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online math sections still feel homework- and test-heavy; a .

Main concern

and limited effective lecture support.

What students said

“The entire life. ”
MATH16
“The . It was like an in-person class.”
MATH2
“ . .”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

several courses, harsh scoring, and high stakes.

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

calculators, and graded harshly for small mistakes.

Multi-page examsNo notes in some coursesHarsh partial creditQuizams
“His exams are awful with 7-9 pages of work”
MATH10
“He does not allow any written notes and expects you to remember these 'easy' formulas.”
MATH1C

Online

Online and little post-exam review; proctoring software is not clearly documented.

High-stakes examsTough gradingHeavy homework
“He makes his exams super difficult & the final is worth 30% of your grade.”
MATH16
“Tests are 50% of grade, final is 20%”
MATH16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN AWAY IF YOU CAN!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Overload

14/100

“The amount of .”

🧠 For Hardcore Learners

70/100

“If your goal is to end the semester with a tangible increase in mastery of the subject matter, and are prepared to .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof made constant mistakes in lectures, skipped key derivations
  • .
  • He is a nice person and his lectures were in a casual environment.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • avg score on the exam was 68% so the class did pretty well this time
  • About half the class has either dropped or failed.
  • He gives two .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Exams

  • No calculator, notes, or study guides for exams.
  • Final is 50% of grade.
  • and he doesn't give crazy problems on them, but you should still do lots of studying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with , and lecture issues across many math courses.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH1011 reviews
MATH1C8 reviews
MATH155 reviews
MATH1B5 reviews
MATH164 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH24 reviews
MATH150A3 reviews
MATH1A3 reviews
CALC1A2 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
Math252 reviews
MATH91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 12

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

6

D+ 3 · D 3

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 2