AI Rate Professor

English

Marc Bojanowski

ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENLG1A · ENGL4A · ENG4C · ENGL5 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENG100 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
94.03%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and will show up; use office hours and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay revision systemIncredible feedbackCaring & funnyStrict attendanceNo exams focus
  • Students repeatedly call him one of the , and real writing growth.
  • ; do the reading and drafts and you can thrive.
  • and a few reviews flag unfairness or harsh inflexibility in rare cases.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Revisions and , but you must draft, revise, and stay present.

Both formats stress revision; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

College English with real reading and multi-essay writing; content is doable but not trivial.

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and punctuality strongly affect participation grades in most sections.

as not mandatory; in-person is clearly strict.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

and personal care.

In-person dominates; the two online reviews are also strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Unique complete/revise systems and multiple rewrite chances .

Format shift

In-person comments highlight rewrites most clearly.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

About 3-4 essays, readings, responses, and side work; manageable if .

Format shift

Online adds journals; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Passionate, funny, office-hour accessible, and famous for .

Format shift

Consistent excellence across nearly all in-person and both online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation with little to no traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and revision-friendly with and meaningful essay coaching.

Main concern

and occasional opaque shifting assignment expectations.

What students said

“Bojanowski is funny and made class super interesting. and the ”
ENGLISH1A
“He ... even if you are 10 mins late he will mark you down.”
ENG1A
“marc was by far the .”
ENGL5

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse online ENG1A feedback still praises determination , and strong growth.

Main concern

Heavy essay and journal volume requires strong time management without in-person class energy.

What students said

“He is absolutely determined to see you succeed more than anything... .”
ENG1A
“ , and when he wants you to redo an essay, his ”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay- and revision-centered rather than closed-book testing, which most students find supportive.

No traditional examsEssay-based assessmentRevision allowedReading responses

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses repeatedly report no exams, 3-4 essays with feedback and revisions, plus reading work.

No exams3-4 essaysRevisions allowedParticipation
“ and the and had interesting prompts.”
ENGLISH1A
“we read 2 books and analyzed them and wrote a total of 4 essays. ”
ENG1A

Online

Online ENG1A focuses on essays and journals with clear redo comments; reviews do not mention proctored tests.

Essays and journalsClear redo feedbackNo proctoring mentioned
“this class will make you write a lot of essays and journals... when he wants you to redo an ”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! One of the . because you actually learn and improve from it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“marc was by far the . , so understanding, motivating”

📝

90/100

“After submitting first drafts Marc and pointers on our papers. After which we were then .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ .”

📅

20/100

“he . He can be understanding but he ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very engaging
  • funny and made class super interesting
  • genuinely cares and engages with your writing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • allows you to revise it
  • If you're struggling with your grade, talk to him
  • This class is not an easy A but you will improve your writing skills

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares so much about his student and wants them to succeed
  • one of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with 94% take-again and and essays; only two online reviews limit format comparison.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 577
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A32 reviews
ENGL1A4 reviews
ENGL54 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENLG1A2 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG4C1 review
ENGL4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

39

A+ 5 · A 31 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1