AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tracey Jackson

MATH1A · STATS2488 · MATH27 · MATHMATH · MATH150A · MATH300A · MATH2558 · MATH15 · MATH155 · TRIG8323 · MATH151 · MATH10 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can keep up with a fast lecture pace and ; otherwise pick a slower, more consistent math instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesTest correctionsLots of homeworkPolarizing graderGroup-work heavy
  • and supportive, others say she is too fast, nitpicky, or condescending.
  • , and , but homework load is frequently heavy.
  • Pace and who need slower instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

, and EC can make solid grades achievable, but hard tests and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Course content ranges from manageable lower math to tough calculus or intermediate algebra depending on section.

Difficulty varies by course number; all comments are in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

40/100

Many sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping means missing dense material covered each day.

and mixed by section.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Would-take-again is about 50 percent, matching a long-running split between strong fans and strong avoiders.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

She often drops lowest scores and allows corrections or EC, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

as 10-plus hours weekly or more.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

About half of ; the other half criticize speed, weak answers to questions, or tone.

Format shift

Teaching quality is polarized and only documented in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework, quizzes, tests, and ; while still requiring large HW sets.

Format shift

Assessment mix is described only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

mixed praise for clarity and recovery options versus complaints about speed and harsh nitpicking.

Main concern

Fast lectures and , or self-study.

What students said

“ and doesn't mind reviewing the material as many times as you need”
MATH15
“You will not learn much from what she teaches you in the classroom because she goes at such a fast pace.”
Math10
“Nicknamed Professor Nascar for her speed of material.”
MATH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often tough but , and note cards appear frequently.

Test correctionsDrop lowest testNotes or 3x5 card sometimes allowedHard tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are frequently hard, sometimes with , and .

Test correctionsDrop lowest exam3x5 note card on some testsHarsh partial-credit grading
“ and .”
MATH155
“ felt like you hadnt explained the problem enough”
MATH15
“her tests are like 10 questions, and she lets you have a 3x5 card, USE IT!!”
MATH151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and doesn't mind reviewing the material as many times as you need, and is respectful about answering any questions no matter how dumb they may seem.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 in-person , and recovery options. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is a great teacher! , and will answer questions without making the asker feel stupid”

⚡ Pace Complaints

35/100

“Nicknamed Professor Nascar for her speed of material.”

📝

34/100

“There is a lot of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super easy to follow and super kind
  • Explained subject really well
  • Also, she was really condescending

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • but she does replace the lowest one with
  • you can easily get an A if show up for class and do the homework

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Groups

  • Lots of homework
  • She has you break into small groups A LOT so be prepared to socialize
  • TONS of HW, but she gave options

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

34 in-person reviews cover many years and courses, but opinion polarity and sparse recent detail lower consistency confidence.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH156 reviews
MATH1556 reviews
MATH1515 reviews
MATH1A3 reviews
MATH273 reviews
Show 8 more courses
Math102 reviews
MATH150A2 reviews
TRIG83232 reviews
1551 review
MATH25581 review
MATH300A1 review
MATHMATH1 review
STATS24881 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1