AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sara Jones

MATH1A · MATH1C · MATH25 · MATH15 · MATH155 · MATH58 · NINEMATH · MATH151 · MATH10 · MATH1B · MATH5 · 89 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other math option and can devote most of .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInsane Homework LoadDisorganized LecturesTest HeavyExtra Credit LifelinePolarizing Care
  • Homework routinely runs 10-20 hours per week with daily multi-assignment dumps.
  • , and poorly paced.
  • , and can salvage grades if you survive the volume.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As and A-minuses appear, but , and heavy use of practice-test EC and corrections.

Almost all grade-effort evidence is in person; the two online reviews split between easy A with work and a failing experience.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Math content plus fast, error-filled, disorganized lectures make concepts harder than they need to be.

Difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that missing class tanks understanding and grades.

; online sample is too small to contrast reliably.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

About 40% would take again and .

; online is mixed but only two reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough-grader tags coexist with , and some light final grading.

Format shift

Recovery options are discussed mostly in person; .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly report 5-plus hours a night and 10-20 hours weekly across textbook, WebAssign, and quizzes.

Format shift

; one online review also notes lots of .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Passion and accessibility are noted, but , and poorly timed.

Format shift

In-person teaching complaints dominate; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and cumulative finals carry heavy weight while .

Format shift

; online exams are mentioned as note-allowed without full proctor detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

crushing homework, long unfinished exams, and and recovery options.

Main concern

Workload and lecture clarity make keeping up extremely hard for busy students.

What students said

“Lots. Of. Homework. An insane amount, especially if you have a busy life. I am talking like 18-20 hours per week.”
MATH15
“ ; no one ever finishes.”
MATH1B
“You actually have to try to fail the class.”
MATH5

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

to an A and a harsh demoralizing experience.

Main concern

Very few online reviews and one strongly negative interpersonal experience.

What students said

“ and you should have no problem getting an A if you do all the work.”
MATH15
“She put me down and you not put you down.”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are long and hard but often paired with , and limited note privileges.

Long Timed ExamsPractice Tests for ECTest Corrections SometimesNotecards on Some TestsCumulative Final

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, sometimes allow notecards or corrections, and finals can be cumulative and hard.

Long Timed ExamsTest CorrectionsPractice Exam Extra CreditNotecards SometimesCumulative Final
“ ; no one ever finishes.”
MATH1B
“ .”
MATH15
“She , and the practice test is worth 5 ec points.”
MATH1B

Online

One positive online review says notes are allowed on exams; .

Notes Allowed on Exams
“ and you should have no problem getting an A if you do all the work.”
MATH15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Lectures are long and dull. She grades harshly and sometimes pettily.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting homework load, lecture clarity, and . Credibility rating: High.

📚

12/100

“Lots. Of. Homework. An insane amount, especially if you have a busy life. I am talking like 18-20 hours per week.”

🗣️ Lecture Clarity

34/100

“ and disorganized, she does not manage class time well leaving concepts unexplained.”

🎯 Grade Recovery Tools

48/100

“ , though, which is the only reason I passed the class.”

👎

34/100

“AVOID!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are passive, as the professor writes on a tablet with minimal student interaction.
  • She messes up simple arithmetic
  • She often does not use her lecture notes which made lectures impossible to follow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Way to much homework, like 5 hours of
  • Tests are 75% of your grade
  • Practice tests are 5 pts EC on tests.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She at least seems nice, which is the only saving grace of the class.
  • She .
  • publicly shames students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

89

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning 2017-2026 with and lecture themes give strong confidence despite some tone polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 512
3 out of 56
2 out of 516
1 out of 532

Course coverage

MATH1514 reviews
MATH510 reviews
MATH1B6 reviews
MATH1A4 reviews
MATH1C4 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH103 reviews
MATH1553 reviews
MATH252 reviews
11441 review
MATH1511 review
MATH581 review
NINEMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

8

C+ 3 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4