AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Trevino

ENG1A · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want queer Chicano literature-focused English and can tolerate late grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLate gradingNiche content focusHigh drop rateUnclear expectationsPaper heavy
  • Most reviewers say Eng 1A is taught as gay Chicano literature studies, which many did not expect.
  • Slow grading and weeks.
  • A minority who want the theme and put in work praise growth and inspiration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Many report easy work and still earn As or Bs, but and .

Both formats show reachable grades .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often called easy or manageable, with the main burden being volume of reading and papers.

Online and in-person both describe moderate intellectual difficulty with heavy thematic reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections are flexible, while as students report the instructor arriving late.

; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about 20% would take again and most warn of content mismatch, late grades, and .

Negative recommendation is strong in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call him tough or biased, but many still finish with As or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of reading and .

Format shift

Paper and reading load is reported online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few praise intelligence and inspiration, but , and poor support.

Format shift

Poor experience themes dominate both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays and papers drive the course with little mention of traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly warn of , and strict attendance, with a few strong endorsements.

Main concern

Content mismatch with Eng 1A .

What students said

“ unless you want to read and .”
Eng1A
“75% of the class dropped.”
2643
“if you put in effort, do the work, you'll be fine.”
2643

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report slow grading, unclear instructions, uncomfortable content for some, and weak organization.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I have yet to receive a grade on 3/4 essays I have turned in... so I do not even know what my grade is at 1 week before the semester is over.”
Eng1A
“He takes forever to grade and .”
Eng1A
“What I didnt like was how his constructive critisim comes off as rude and didn't feel comfortable asking for further help.”
2643

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is almost entirely essay-based; reviews do not clearly prove proctored exams or special online lockdown tools.

Essay-driven assessmentMultiple papersSlow essay returnParticipation creditNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation rather than traditional closed-book exams.

Multiple essaysParticipation creditLate grade entry
“ and the fact that we got credit for participation.”
Eng1A
“he never graded anything in three months, causing most of the .”
2643

Online

Online assessment is essay and module based with ; proctoring is not clearly documented.

Essays and papersSlow gradingConfusing modules
“By the time essay #3 was assigned, essay #1 had barely been graded.”
Eng1A
“Module construction and .”
Eng1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class wasn't the . Trevino and he got upset when they weren't fulfilled.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🕒

20/100

“I have yet to receive a grade on 3/4 essays I have turned in... 1 week before the semester is over.”

📚 Content Expectation Gap

25/100

“Not an English class. It is gay Chicano history class.”

👎 Overall Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

✨

70/100

“I've improved a and writing because of him.”

Theme 1

📖 About Course Content

  • Gay Chicano literature focus
  • Not what I signed up for
  • Important content for some students

Theme 2

⏱️ About Organization and Feedback

  • Takes forever to grade

Theme 3

🚪 About Retention

  • 75% of the class dropped
  • Half of the class dropped
  • More than half the class dropped

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews with and content-focus themes are solid, but the sample is smaller and strongly polarized.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

264310 reviews
Eng1A10 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 2