AI Rate Professor

Theater

Laura Downing-Lee

THEATER13 · THAR2149 · THAR13 · TA10BAND13 · THAR10A · THARTHAR · THAR1 · THAR1A · THAR10B · THAR6138 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want real theater training and can handle heavy work; avoid if you only need an easy GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate Theater MentorHeavy WorkloadNot an Easy ACaring but StrictHands-On Acting
  • Deeply caring, inspirational theater teacher who pushes real growth.
  • Workload and projects are heavy; this is not a free GE A.
  • and students ready to show up and work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are reachable, but only with , and real participation.

Nearly all grade-effort evidence is in person; one online review does not change that picture.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content and performance expectations are demanding, especially for non-majors seeking a light GE.

In-person acting and history courses drive the challenge signal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as required for theater and history sections.

; the lone online review also marks attendance yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and growth even when the workload is stressful.

Online praise is strong but thin; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and care help, but several students call her a .

Format shift

; online has no grading conflict.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly worksheets, reading, performances, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are almost entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Passionate, helpful, and growth-focused teaching with occasional disorganization or intensity.

Format shift

Online sample is purely positive; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Blend of worksheets, quizzes/exams, creative projects, and performance grades.

Format shift

In-person assessments dominate the evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students praise passion and growth, while , and mandatory participation.

Main concern

Lots of reading, worksheets, and GE hunters.

What students said

“If you do your work and show up to class its an easy A.”
THAR10B
“It isn't an easy A class. There are many worksheet and you need textbook to complete them.”
THAR1
“She does assign a lot of work because she wants you to really learn so ."”
THAR10B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

caring, flexible, and inspirational during remote theater work.

Main concern

Only one online review, so .

What students said

“laura is the very flexible and inspirational makes you want to continue in theatre arts”
THAR10A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often pull from worksheets and readings, while big creative or .

Worksheet-Based TestsProjectsPerformance GradesReading Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and manageable if you study; major projects drive difficulty.

Fill-in WorksheetsTextbook BasedBig Creative ProjectPerformance Grades
“Tests pull directly from "fill-in-the-blanks" worksheets, which are verbatim from the textbook and you get them well in advance.”
THAR1
“ if you study for it,watch crash course theatre history and you will be fine. so do it.”
THAR1
“she assigns two major projects during the semester that are insane”
THAR2149

Online

One online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have literally cried happy tears over how much love and effort Laura pours into her students. She does assign a lot of work because she wants you to really learn so ."”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting passion, workload, and serious-actor fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Laura is a great teacher who really knows her stuff in the theater world.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“10/10 would take her again!”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“ .”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“laura is the very flexible and inspirational”

Theme 1

🎭 About Teaching Style

  • Her classes are inspirational and
  • practices what she preaches
  • passionate about her subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not an easy A
  • If you do your work and show up to class its an easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Stress Factors

  • notoriously stressful, full of unfulfilled deadlines and last minute changes
  • She can be strict but it is only because she wants you to learn
  • You need to make sure you have A LOT of free time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews over many years consistently describe passion, heavy work, and strong outcomes for committed students.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 59
3 out of 58
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

THAR112 reviews
THAR10A5 reviews
THAR10B4 reviews
THAR134 reviews
THAR1A3 reviews
Show 5 more courses
THAR21492 reviews
THAR61382 reviews
TA10BAND131 review
THARTHAR1 review
THEATER131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 9 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1