AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elizabeth Giuliani

MATH9 · MATH161 · MATH15 · MATH155 · MATH0443 · MATH150 · MATH151 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60.87%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and can handle a sometimes harsh classroom tone.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized instructorTest heavyHomework mirrors examsExtra credit availableCan be condescending
  • Reviews and reports of rudeness, lateness, or no-shows.
  • but essential because quizzes and .
  • Doing the work and using drops or can yield solid grades despite uneven interpersonal experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, and help, but low exam averages and tough-grader tags mean you still must work.

Both formats stress do the ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Stats and algebra content is standard and harder when lectures confuse.

Online older MATH15 reviews call it hard but fair; recent in-person MATH15 feels tougher.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, though some require it and participation rewards showing up.

In ; online mixed with some mandatory live sessions.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

About 61% would take again, matching the and .

Older online praise is warmer; recent in-person MATH15 drives more caution.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and help, yet grades rest on few tests and some call her a tough grader.

Format shift

older online praise.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

but ; the real load is preparing for frequent quizzes and several exams.

Format shift

but essential for .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and humor for some classes collide with belittling tone, lateness, and cancelled sessions for others.

Format shift

Online is split 2 positive and 1 harsh drop; in person is strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple exams and but .

Format shift

and in-person stats comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person ranges from hilarious and encouraging to condescending with and cancelled review days.

Main concern

Recent MATH15 complaints about feeling stupid for questions and .

What students said

“Such an amazing and fun class. Whether it was intentional or not I found her to be absolutely hysterical every class.”
MATH15
“Makes kids feel stupid for asking questions.”
MATH15
“ class before our final and we were supposed to get a review packet.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

two praise clear stats lectures and and non-teaching and dropped.

Main concern

Live online .

What students said

“By far the . She wants you to pass and will help you achieve that.”
MATH15
“She does NOT teach. She just does the math. Shes so bad I dropped the class without refund”
MATH161

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and softening strictness.

Homework-similar examsDrops lowest scoreExtra creditTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grading is heavily test-based with and occasional whole-class on misgraded items.

Test heavyHomework mirrors examsExtra creditFew graded items
“most of the exam questions are 1 for 1 copy's of .”
MATH15
“You're graded off like 7 things all semester.”
MATH15

Online

Online stats used multiple exams, quiz packs counting as an , and .

Multiple examsQuiz pack equals examLowest score droppedOptional homework
“She gives 3 exams, 10 quizzes (count as 1 exam) and a final and at the end of .”
MATH15
“There are 4 exams for the whole semester, but at the end of the class she .”
MATH15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The but if you do it you'll be prepared for and exam.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarized Experience

52/100

“The ratings on this professor are true, but it's a bit overexaggerating. Professor Giuliani cares about students success and efforts in the class.”

📝

70/100

“her exams are basically based on the if .”

⚠️ Classroom Climate Risk

30/100

“She makes every student feel stupid for asking the simplest questions.”

👍 When It Clicks

85/100

“By far the . She wants you to pass and will help you achieve that.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor who is very easy going and
  • She just does the math
  • Her lectures were easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Plenty of opportunity for
  • If the 5th highest score in the class on the first exam was a 72/100
  • but all of the homework assignments

Theme 3

💬 About Tone and Reliability

  • Makes kids feel stupid for asking questions
  • she ghosted my class on the
  • She managed to make math fun and exciting, not intimidating

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

23 reviews over several years show a stable polarized pattern with enough detail for solid confidence.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1512 reviews
MATH1554 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
MATH1612 reviews
MATH04431 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1501 review
MATH91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 7 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2