Jamie Kulp

CHEM42 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 91/100
RMP rating: 4.4/5
Take again: 90%
Difficulty: 2.8

The decision

Strong pick for CHEM42 if you want an enthusiastic, supportive intro chem professor who makes the material approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesCaring and supportiveExtra credit availableLecture-heavy prep chemPractice exams match tests

to follow.
; but helpful.
One older review flags disorganized lectures and a , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most students report A or A+ with fair tests and , though content still needs real study.

Both online and ; the harshest grading complaint is from an older in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro chem with moderate difficulty ratings and lectures many students call easy to follow.

Online reviews rate difficulty slightly higher .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while others do not, so flexibility depends on the term.

Online and in-person both report .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

About 90% would take again, with repeated praise for passion, clarity, and support for struggling students.

Recommendation is strong in both formats; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and fair tests for most; one older review calls him a .

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in recent reviews across both formats than in the 2017 in-person complaint.

Workload

Light

72/100

; graded by relatively few items with lecture-focused assessment.

Format shift

Both formats describe manageable work; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and but sharp organization criticism.

Format shift

Online reviews are uniformly glowing; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Lecture-heavy course with fair tests and ; HW often optional.

Format shift

; online also stresses lectures and graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and willingness to help; one older review is strongly negative on organization and grading transparency.

Main concern

and a minority report scattered lectures or .

What students said

“His lectures are very easy to follow and he always checks that the class is following along.”
CHEM42

“His lectures are extremely scattered. Finally got our grade summary the day before the final.”
CHEM42

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students call him inspiring and and solid grades if you engage.

Main concern

Coursework can still feel difficult without strong self-discipline online.

What students said

“His lectures make you want to keep learning more, and .”
CHEM42

“The work in this class is difficult but if you are struggling.”
CHEM42

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are generally fair and lecture-aligned, with .

Practice exams similar to testsFair midtermsLecture-based testsOne report of hard final

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice exams; one review says the final had uncovered material.

Practice exams match examsTests from lectureFair testsHarsh final reported once

“He gives practice exams that are and !”
CHEM42

“ but the even covered.”
CHEM42

Online

Online reviews ; difficulty is moderate with supportive teaching.

Supportive if strugglingLecture-focused assessment

“The work in this class is difficult but if you are struggling.”
CHEM42

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Dr. Kulp is literally the !! His lectures are very easy to follow and he always checks that the class is following along.”
Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews spanning online and in-person CHEM42, highlighting teaching, grades, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“His lectures make you want to keep learning more, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ !”

❤️ Support & Care

86/100

“ and always willing to help and answer any questions you may have.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“His lectures are extremely scattered. Never and it took 3 weeks to get tests back.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Prof. Kulp was really friendly and definitely passionate about Chemistry.
His lectures are very easy to follow and he always checks that the class is following along.
Super sweet and enthusiastic about chemistry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

but it helps
Tests are fair only thing that
but the even covered.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

He is super sweet and considerate of his students.
The nicest teacher! Really cares about his students and wants them to succeed.
if you struggle with chemistry!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed CHEM42 reviews spanning 2016-2025 with strong consensus, tempered by one sharp older negative outlier.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57

4 out of 52

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM4210 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

B 2

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Rather not say 1