AI Rate Professor

Communication

Elizabeth Simas

COMM10 · COMM6 · GOVT2305 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Good choice for COMM if you want a and can handle speeches plus regular assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring feedback-focusedClear speech rubricsTest and paper heavyWelcoming public speaking spaceAccessible outside class
  • Strong support and and COMM courses.
  • , and weekly posts but stays manageable for most.
  • A minority find lectures dull or critique style harsh and biased.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Most reported grades are A if you complete speeches and weekly work; effort is required but not extreme.

Online reviews emphasize easy A for finishing work; stress.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Intro COMM and GOVT content with moderate difficulty and .

Online async GOVT felt very easy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Attendance or participation is frequently required, especially for speaking and discussion courses.

; async online is the main flexible exception.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students would take her again for caring teaching and .

Online recommendations are steadier; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and good grades for completed work; occasional bias and tough speech critique comments.

Format shift

; in-person speech critique draws more fairness concerns.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Weekly posts, papers, quizzes, and speeches are realistic but not light for every student.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and weekly work more; in-person centers on speeches.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many call her caring, thorough, and funny; a minority say lectures fall flat or feel biased.

Format shift

; older mixed formats show more dull-lecture complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests rather than one dominant mode.

Format shift

In-person emphasizes speeches; online leans papers, quizzes, and posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person feedback praises thorough funny lectures and critique and bias.

Main concern

Public critique after speeches and .

What students said

“The rubrics for and and helpful.”
COMM10
“You present, then she has classmates criticize you then she criticizes you in front of everyone.”
COMM10

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students often call her sweet and and solid grades if .

Main concern

Papers, quizzes, and weekly posts add up; a few find materials dull.

What students said

“As long as you get the .”
COMM10
“took her asynchronous class, super easy. on average it was about 1-2 hours of work per week.”
GOVT2305

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is standard course work with quizzes, papers, and speeches; .

Quizzes and testsSpeech performancesWeekly discussion postsPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person COMM focuses on speeches with peer and instructor critique; .

Speech presentationsPeer critiqueTest heavy tags
“You present, then she has classmates criticize you then she criticizes you in front of everyone.”
COMM10
“She puts obscure questions on the and seem very unimportant to the actual theories.”
COMM10

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, papers, and discussion posts; tests are doable if you watch lectures and read.

QuizzesPapersDiscussion postsLecture videos
“Workload is super manageable and as long as you watch lectures and read the textbook.”
COMM6
“There are 5 papers along with quizzes and class discussion posts weekly.”
COMM10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She knows that public speaking is hard for many people and makes such a welcoming space.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews across online and in-person COMM and and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Her lectures are super thorough and funny and and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“I feel like I learnt a lot and and .”

📝 Workload Reality

56/100

“Honestly she expects a fair amount of work but its realistic.”

⚠️ Critique Style Concern

40/100

“You present, then she has classmates criticize you then she criticizes you in front of everyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Elizabeth is a and grading and accesible class structure.
  • Shes a .
  • Shes so kind and easy to approach and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you get the .
  • took her asynchronous class, super easy.
  • You have to read the chapters & watch the lectures to do well on the tests.

Theme 3

🎤

  • The rubrics for and and helpful.
  • You present, then she has classmates criticize you then she criticizes you in front of everyone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across COMM and GOVT from 2019-2025 with and a few conflicting lecture-quality notes.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM106 reviews
COMM62 reviews
GOVT23051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values