AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Joyce Giammattei

FNTFNT · FOODNUTRITION · FDNT62 · FDNT60 · FOOD62 · FDNT1237 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can keep up with and deadlines; skip if you want a low-effort easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Reading LoadMixed Online FeedbackSlow Email RepliesOpen-Book QuizzesWork-Hard-for-A
  • , and case studies keep workload high.
  • online ones.
  • An A is possible if you stay on deadlines, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students report you must work hard for an A; reading and .

Online students more often say do the work and you will be fine; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is nutrition fundamentals with , but weekly volume makes it feel hard.

Online comments stress weekly chapter-quiz-discussion loops; in-person comments stress dry lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others say it is not required; comments rarely center attendance.

Evidence is mixed across online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Newer online reviews often recommend her if you do the work, while .

Recommendation is stronger in recent online reviews than in older in-person ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tags and comments , and hard open-book quizzes.

Format shift

Online has both fair and tough-grader notes; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly reading, quizzes, discussions, and lengthy case studies create a heavy load.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework; online weekly structure is especially consistent.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some students praise clear expectations and feedback; many others call lectures dry, vague, or unhelpful.

Format shift

; older in-person reviews are harsher.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly assignments and , and case studies.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly quiz and discussion cadence; and writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Many older in-person reviews , and support weak, with some saying only a few students earned A's.

Main concern

Confusing expectations and .

What students said

“you work for an A and it so .”
FDNT62
“Ugh, stay away! She teaches .”
FDNT62
“BORING! and basically reads from the book.”
FDNT60

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online FDNT classes mean weekly chapters, quizzes, discussions, and case studies; open-book , and .

Main concern

Heavy weekly workload and .

What students said

“As long as youre on top of your work, she grades pretty easily and fair.”
FDNT62
“ , but she takes advantage of that.”
FDNT62
“Just do the work and you'll get a high score.”
FDNT60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes are often open book online but still detail-heavy; .

Open Book QuizzesWeekly QuizzesDetail-Heavy TestsCase Studies

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe average-to-hard tests with minute details and sometimes questions from picture captions.

Detail-Heavy TestsWriting Plus TestsNo Curve Mentioned
“ ..”
FDNT62
“teacher gets test questions from blurb captions under small pictures in book.”
FDNT62

Online

yet require careful chapter reading; weekly quizzes and activities are common.

Open Book QuizzesWeekly QuizzesChapter Reading
“ ”
FDNT62
“ , but she takes advantage of that.”
FDNT62

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work and you'll get a high score. No drama—chill and relaxed vibe”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews spanning online and in-person formats, weighted toward comment detail and consistency. Credibility rating: High.

📚

28/100

“This class requires a lot of .”

⚖️ Picky But Workable Grades

38/100

“As long as youre on top of your work, she grades pretty easily and fair.”

📧 Slow Support Responses

40/100

“She takes long to reply to emails, she is a .”

👍

52/100

“Do the work and read the chapters and you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and fair.
  • and basically reads from the book.
  • encouraging, approachable and a pleasant personality

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • you work for an A and it so .
  • Bad grade, she wants you to do lot of work for 5 points.
  • , but she takes advantage of that.

Theme 3

📧 About Availability

  • .
  • Joyce was a and .
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews span 2005-2025 with and in-person split, though older in-person comments are harsher than recent online ones.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

FDNT6220 reviews
FDNT602 reviews
FDNT12371 review
FNTFNT1 review
FOOD621 review
Show 1 more courses
FOODNUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values