AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Sandra Hollimon

ANTHRO1AND2 · ANTHRO2 · ANTHR2 · ANTH2 · ANTH1 · ANTHRO3 · ANTHRO1 · ANTHRO24081 · ANTHR3 · ANTH32 · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

unless you only need a checkbox GE and and survive quiz/exam errors.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedTest heavyHands-offVague quizzesLow engagement
  • Many students call the
  • Grade often and a few high-stakes exams
  • Content is not hard, but frustration and low learning make her a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Material is often easy, but vague quizzes, few grade categories, and unreliable.

Online students can earn easy As with open-book quizzes if careful; in-person As and test issues.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is repeatedly called easy and low-depth, though .

Both formats describe easy material; difficulty mainly comes from organization and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and several reviews say missing a few classes dropped them to a B.

In-person attendance is strict; online is usually self-paced with but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and most recent reviews urge students to pick any other professor.

and in person, with only a minority of easy-GE style positive notes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and errors on exams that are slow to fix.

Format shift

; in-person and a small number of tests.

Workload

Light

74/100

Usually weekly quizzes and a .

Format shift

Both formats are graded by few things; online is almost entirely quizzes and exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Dominant theme is , and students teaching themselves.

Format shift

Online feels abandoned; in-person lectures are called boring, sidetracked, or substance-light.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Courses are overwhelmingly quiz and .

Format shift

Online is weekly quizzes plus three exams; and maybe a paper or project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Lectures often feel boring or , and exams dominate with sparse assignments.

Main concern

, and exams that do not match lectures or study guides.

What students said

“THE MOST DISORGANIZED TEACHER... there was not a ACTUALLY due.”
ANTH2
“ if u want the easiest A, j dont miss more than 2 classes!!”
ANTH2
“run don't walk away from this teacher.”
ANTHR3

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and a few exams; professor contact is rare and Canvas organization is often criticized.

Main concern

, and almost no instructor presence.

What students said

“ so unstructured she doesnt care about being a teacher at all.”
ANTH1
“This teacher literally gave up on teaching 3 weeks in.”
ANTHRO3
“Everything is open book since the class online.”
ANTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and are often vague, tricky, or mismatched to provided material.

Weekly quizzesFew high-stakes examsPoorly worded questionsTest errorsOpen book online

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Heavily weighted exams with study guides that often fail to match the test and .

Test heavyFew assignmentsStudy guides unhelpfulAttendance-linked grades
“very few assignments but ”
ANTH32
“There are three tests and a paper, so if you want an A you have to do well on all of them.”
ANTH2

Online

Open-book weekly quizzes and noncumulative exams are common, but wording and errors frustrate students.

Open bookWeekly quizzesThree examsNo retakes often
“Everything is open book since the class online.”
ANTH2
“ and intentionally vague seemingly curated to trick you.”
ANTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE MOST DISORGANIZED TEACHER... there was not a ACTUALLY due.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and in-person anthropology courses, highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

26/100

“If you actually care about learning the .”

🧪

34/100

“ and intentionally vague seemingly curated to trick you.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

24/100

“run don't walk away from this teacher.”

📚

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • shows ZERO passion for teaching
  • Not sure this professor actually existed
  • completely given up on teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if u want the easiest A, j dont miss more than 2 classes!!
  • Finished with a B because I missed 2 quizzes
  • provided

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • so unstructured
  • not a ACTUALLY due

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with , and engagement across formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 524
3 out of 513
2 out of 523
1 out of 527

Course coverage

ANTH210 reviews
ANTHRO19 reviews
ANTH18 reviews
ANTHR37 reviews
ANTHRO26 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ANTHRO34 reviews
09001 review
88731 review
ANTH321 review
ANTHR21 review
ANTHRO1AND21 review
ANTHRO240811 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 3

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1