AI Rate Professor

Business

Evan Field

RE55 · BADBAD · BAD10 · BAD18 · PLS53 · BUS225 · BADSECT · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging class and will attend, read, and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilariousEngaging StorytellerClear Business LawQuiz CorrectionsEntertaining Lectures
  • Students repeatedly praise funny, story-driven lectures that make dry law material stick.
  • and some .
  • A minority find him off-topic or weak online with ungraded work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A solid grade is reachable with attendance, reading, and , but an A still needs .

Almost ; the one online review does not claim an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

and discussion, though law concepts and .

In-person BAD and ; the online PLS review felt harder due to structure issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

because lectures and participation carry the class, but policies vary by section.

In-person reviews stress showing up; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and clarity, with only isolated harsh outliers.

In-person recommendations are strong; the lone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and pass-friendly .

Format shift

Leniency is described mainly in person; as incomplete.

Workload

Light

72/100

Weekly quizzes, reading, and .

Format shift

; online complained of few but .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students call him one of the funniest and clearest instructors, especially in business law.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is dominant; online teaching was criticized as rambling.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Weekly quizzes, non-cumulative tests, and .

Format shift

In-person details dominate; online had few assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and highly recommended for business law and related courses.

Main concern

and lectures sometimes wander off topic.

What students said

“incredible teacher. Great at explaining things, and . He's also probably the funniest teacher I've ever had.”
BAD18
“I've never laughed so much during a class Evan gets that you probably aren't studying to be a lawyer.”
BAD18
“A fantastic and he is hilarious, it's an easy class, would strongly recommend”
BAD10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative about rambling lectures, unused expensive textbook, and ungraded assignments.

Main concern

Poor online structure and .

What students said

“ Canvas.”
PLS53

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can be hard, but and discussion-based review make the overall system fairer.

Weekly QuizzesQuiz CorrectionsNon-Cumulative TestsScantronOccasional Essays

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

harder midterms or finals that reward attendance and engagement.

Weekly Quizzes with CorrectionsHard TestsNon-Cumulative ExamsEssay Component
“ , but if you show up and and your paper, you'll pass.”
BAD18
“Weekly quizes on previous weeks chapter - if an answer is wrong, find the correct answer in the text and submit a paragraph with page and line number.”
RE55

Online

The single online review .

Few Assignments
“ Canvas.”
PLS53

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's also probably the funniest teacher I've ever had. !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, emphasizing humor, clarity, and quiz-based assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

😂 Humor and Engagement

90/100

“He should've been a stand up comedian instead of a lawyer! He is so FUNNY... ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ . Great sense of humer and creates a fun atmosphere for the class.”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“Definitely One of the better instructors at the SRJC. !”

📝

58/100

“ , but if you show up and and your paper, you'll pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes very dry material relatable with his examples and stories.
  • 2 1/2 hours of entertaining lectures.
  • He made every lecture fun and entertaining.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you'll settle for a B or C then this class is fairly easy.
  • Quizzed do not count, but you can correct your answers to get credit.
  • I think he grades on a so its fairly easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Weak Spots

  • He gets off topic so easily and wanders off when he is explaining an idea or term.
  • is knowledgeable, but rambles, and goes off-topic non stop.
  • He is always talking about his family.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews with strong in-person consistency, but older dates and only one online sample limit full coverage.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BAD1813 reviews
BAD104 reviews
RE553 reviews
BADBAD1 review
BADSECT1 review
Show 2 more courses
BUS2251 review
PLS531 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2