AI Rate Professor

Nursing

TIFFANY LUNDQVIST

CNA · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you need a structured CNA path and can handle strict professional expectations; the sample is small and mixed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing CNA instructorOrganized course structureCaring clinical coachHarsh when criticizedEasy material, high stakes vibe
  • Two recent , and accessibility of CNA content.
  • One strong review alleges degrading talk and zero room for .
  • Material is described as easy and all three reporters earned A grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

All three reviewers earned A and call the material easy if you pay attention and show up.

All evidence is in-person CNA; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as easier than high school and straightforward when lectures and .

Only in-person CNA comments available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and missing too much class hurts outcomes.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two students strongly recommend her while one calls it the and .

All in-person; recommendations are sharply split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades can be high for diligent students, but the negative review describes zero room to mess up.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and clinical all matter, yet overall material difficulty is called easy.

Format shift

In-person CNA structure only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praised as organized and motherly by some, condemned as degrading by another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Success depends , and communication via email.

Format shift

No online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CNA and a severely negative culture claim.

Main concern

One student reports degrading instructor behavior and no margin for error.

What students said

“Tiffany has the organization of this course down to a science.”
CNA
“She was like a group.”
CNA
“The material is easy but the instructors are extremely degrading.”
CNA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize lab and clinical .

Skills labClinical evaluationLecture attentionMandatory attendance

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CNA success hinges on lecture, skills lab, and .

Skills labClinicalPay attention in lecture
“If you pay attention in and clinical seriously, and make sure you don't miss too much class, you'll do great.”
CNA

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material is easy but the instructors are extremely degrading. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting split praise and concern in CNA instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

📋 Organization Praise

80/100

“Tiffany has the organization of this course down to a science.”

❤️ Clinical Care

85/100

“She was like a group.”

⚠️ Culture Warning

20/100

“She and the other instructors speak about private information about students in front of other students.”

Theme 1

🩺 About CNA Training

  • This class is a great stepping stone to nursing!
  • As a 16 year old that took her class and found it easier than a high school class says a lot.
  • Make sure you read her emails!

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness and Tone

  • There is no room to mess up you basically have to be a robot to not get on their bad side.
  • She always made sure we were okay and !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent CNA reviews with contradictory .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CNA3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values