AI Rate Professor

History

Anessa Cloristin

HIST21 · HIST30 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you like history and and essays; expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading-heavy coursesCaring and knowledgeableSlow gradingClear criteria when organizedHeavy writing load online
  • In-person students praise engaged lectures and a kind, knowledgeable instructor
  • Workload is reading- and writing-heavy, with and finals
  • Online sections draw , and weak email replies

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Most report A or A-range grades if they keep up with readings and .

Online reviews stress more writing time; steady weekly work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is interesting but reading- and .

; in-person students more often call the load doable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory while others do not, with .

Online as no; several in-person reviews list yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and solid lectures, despite workload and grading speed gripes.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online praise is mixed with frustration about volume and communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Many call her fair or easy once work is submitted, though a few online students label her tougher and slow.

Format shift

Online has more tough-grader comments; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Weekly readings, discussion boards or assignments, plus multi-essay midterms and .

Format shift

Online students especially report more weekly writing time than expected for a prereq.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students frequently praise knowledge, lectures, care, and engagement, with weaker marks for online responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly assignments and and finals.

Format shift

and dual-essay exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person classes highlight strong lectures, care for students, and a .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Anessa's such a lovely and attentive professor! Yes, the course is very reading-heavy, but the workload is manageable.”
HIST30
“She's obviously extremely knowledgeable and her lectures are good... as she's very engaged and obviously cares.”
0944
“She is pretty calm and respectful and won't bother you too much. also has good lectures”
HIST30

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online HIST sections teach interesting material but pile on reading, discussion boards, and and uneven communication.

Main concern

Heavy and .

What students said

“Cloristin never or . and doesn't adhere to her OWN policies in the syllabus.”
HIST21
“Two essays due for midterm as well as final. no communication”
HIST30
“Great professor! Class is heavy but the material is very interesting”
HIST21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ongoing written work rather than clearly student-friendly open-book tests.

Essay midterms and finalsHeavy reading prepNo proctoring details stated

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final and weekly assignments, without detailing proctoring tools.

Midterm and final prepWeekly assignmentsLecture-supported exams
“About 1 assignment every week and . The midterm and , so be very aware!”
HIST30
“ , as long as you know how much time it's going to take you, it's an easy enough course.”
HIST30

Online

Online reviews describe two essays for midterm and proctoring details.

Two essays midterm and finalDiscussion boardsHeavy reading
“2 essays for the midterm and .”
HIST21
“Two essays due for midterm as well as final. no communication”
HIST30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Anessa's such a lovely and attentive professor! Yes, the course is very reading-heavy, but the workload is manageable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (7 online, 7 in person), highlighting care, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Teaching

80/100

“I thought she was such a kind teacher and easy to relate to since she is 30. She's sweet and makes you laugh.”

📚

34/100

“If you are interested in tons and tons of .”

🐢

45/100

“takes forever to grade & little to no communication”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knows her stuff. Imparts her knowledge very well.
  • She is pretty calm and respectful and won't bother you too much. also has good lectures
  • W Teacher fr.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • As an average performing student, it was not difficult to get a good grade.
  • there is SO MUCH writing.
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Cloristin never or .
  • Uploads modules late stealing time from students
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews split evenly online and in person provide solid but still moderate sample size with consistent themes.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST307 reviews
HIST214 reviews
09443 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2