AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Emily Schmidt

RELS32 · RELS1 · COMPMYTH · HUMAN8 · HUM8 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
47.37%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a lighter GE grade and can self-manage messy organization.

Best fit · Easy A HunterHeavy Reading LoadPolarizing PresenceUnorganized ModulesEasy When EngagedFair Essay Grading
  • some call her inspiring and and rude.
  • , and occasional fair tests.
  • , but communication and late modules frustrate many.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and high marks even when teaching quality feels weak.

Both formats report easy grades; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is GE-level with but concepts are not mathematically hard.

Online leans lighter; and essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional in others across years.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; love for humor and passion balances complaints about organization and tone.

Stronger praise in older in-person RELS; more recent online/HUM critiques.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students repeatedly call grading fair or easy, with and quizzes.

Format shift

Online and in-person both lean lenient; a few plagiarism-zero conflicts appear online.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Lots of reading and several papers, but few high-stakes hurdles and .

Format shift

Online often lighter contact; .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

charismatic and .

Format shift

In-person passion praised more; online organization and response time criticized more.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of readings, unessays/papers, discussions, quizzes, and fair midterms/finals.

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and readings; in-person adds lectures and study-guide tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person courses range from charismatic, inspirational lectures to rude or unprepared sessions depending on term.

Main concern

Inconsistent classroom vibe and last-minute module posting.

What students said

“ . Possibly my favorite prof at the JC.”
RELS1
“She somehow posts every module 6 days late”
HUMAN8
“Easy A . She doesn't interact with students who want to learn about religion .”
RELS1

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are reading- and discussion-heavy with light quizzes; organization and .

Main concern

Late modules, cancelled content, and .

What students said

“ , but fairly easy.”
HUMAN8
“Prof. Schmidt had many cancellations for our weekly modules, so we missed about 25% of the course.”
RELS32
“She never emails back, but she ”
HUMAN8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

used; many courses weight papers and discussions more than proctored testing.

Study Guide TestsEssay HeavyDiscussion BoardsFair Midterm Final

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; essays and quizzes also count.

Fair Midterm FinalStudy GuidesEssaysLecture Based
“the study guide”
RELS32
“ and the study guides are accurate”
RELS32

Online

, and discussion boards; quizzes sometimes skipped for tech issues.

Discussion BoardsLight QuizzesRead and WatchNo Clear Proctoring Mentioned
“No Zoom meetings. Just read and watch the vids. .”
RELS32
“We never took a quiz because of technical difficulties”
RELS32

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a good person but not a good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (9 online, 17 in-person) with mixed tones. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ !”

📚 Easy Grade Path

78/100

“Easy A . She doesn't interact with students who want to learn about religion .”

🗂️ Organization Issues

40/100

“She somehow posts every module 6 days late”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very funny & charismatic
  • She is extremely rude, and does not get back to emails
  • An amazing professor, great speaker, and hilarious personality

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A
  • she grades as such. .
  • grades them very leniently

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • Be prepared to write a lot.
  • Expect to read a TON
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews across many years, both formats, and mixed but detailed opinions support a stable mid-range picture.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HUMAN811 reviews
RELS18 reviews
RELS324 reviews
HUM82 reviews
COMPMYTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1