AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maria-Antonia Robertson

MATH27 · MATH161 · STATS15 · MATH15 · MATH155 · MATH10 · 93 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
78.95%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and and office hours.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesClear grading criteriaAccessible outside classPractice testsCaring
  • Clear, step-by-step stats teaching that helps math-anxious students succeed
  • Practice tests closely match exams and
  • ; , and you can earn strong grades

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

As and strong grades are common with homework and practice tests, but and .

In-person praise for fair success is stronger; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

She breaks concepts down clearly so content feels approachable, though stats still requires steady practice.

; difficulty tags still sit mid-high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warn that skipping hurts performance.

Online also often requires live participation; in-person tags stress show-up.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

High would-take-again rate and and support.

In-person is overwhelmingly positive; online is more mixed but still has strong fans.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and , though picky point deductions appear for small errors.

Format shift

In-person more often mentions redo options; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and test prep are real but aligned with learning; not light but predictable.

Format shift

; tests drive the pressure.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Consistently praised for , and office-hour support that builds math confidence.

Format shift

In-person excellence is dominant; a minority online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

homework and practice exams that closely mirror real tests.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy with formula sheets sometimes allowed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person stats and math are praised for , and strong support that turns math fear into success.

Main concern

and cold-calling can stress anxious students.

What students said

“I am convinced that anyone can pass her class. She really makes sure you understand before moving on.”
MATH15
“if u claim to be "bad at math," take maria's class, trust me. .”
MATH15
“Professor Robertson is one of the most rude teachers I have had.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections can feel intense with mandatory participation and test weight; success still tracks with , and practice exams.

Main concern

Some students found her harsh or unaccommodating when struggling online.

What students said

“If you read the notes and do the !”
MATH15
“Honestly one of the is so rude and disrespectful”
MATH15
“The practice tests are nearly identical to the tests, so if hours... you will easily pass.”
MATH161

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central but , and some point-recovery options.

Practice tests nearly identicalFormula sheets sometimesTest corrections or redosTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests often allow formula sheets and .

Practice testsFormula sheetsTest redosHomework supports tests
“You also had the , and your worst test at the end of the semester.”
MATH15
“ but still allows them.”
MATH15

Online

and notes support; proctoring details are not clearly described.

Practice testsNotes requiredTest heavy
“Tests are a big part of your grade, but so that you can study.”
MATH15
“ and .”
MATH161

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if u claim to be "bad at math," take maria's class, trust me. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math and stats reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Excellence

90/100

“She was amazing and from what I've heard continues to be amazing. She is the .”

👍 Strong Recommendation

86/100

“ !”

📝 Practice-Test Support

68/100

“ makes it easier to learn the material”

⏱️ Test-Heavy Structure

45/100

“ but she provides practice tests and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she does amazing lectures and it shows that she wants you to learn the material
  • she somehow made it fun! Upbeat personality with a sense of humor
  • and gives you practice exams that really help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Your grade is entirely dependent on your effort
  • she is a littlest things
  • I got an A but I'd give her an A++

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is always happy to answer questions
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

93

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with strong recent volume, detailed comments, and consistent praise for teaching quality across courses.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 568
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 58
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1536 reviews
MATH276 reviews
MATH1614 reviews
MATH1552 reviews
MATH101 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

20

A 17 · A- 3

B range

13

B+ 2 · B 10 · B- 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1