AI Rate Professor

English

Ruben Sandoval

ENG1A · ENGL5 · ENGLISH1A · ENGLI0009 · ENG33 · ENGENG · ENG100 · GOV2306 · ENG4842 · ENGL100 · ENGL8268 · ENG0828 · 2306GOVT · ENGL1B · ENG5 · ENGE · ENGLISH5 · ENGL1A · ENGLS4 · ENGL33 · ENG1B · ENG1004843 · 93 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already write well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear assignmentsEssay-heavyRepetitive lecturesPolarizing personalityTough or arbitrary grading
  • some call him funny and easy if you crack his format; , and the .
  • Heavy essay load with vague prompts, changing due dates, and .
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative on professionalism and classroom conduct.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students get easy As once they learn his rigid format; and C territory despite prior A writing.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is mostly essay writing rather than hard theory, but it should.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and emphasize showing up, while some students say lectures are useless storytelling.

In-person evidence only; reports conflict by semester.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and many detailed reviews warn of confusion, poor organization, and unprofessional conduct.

Based on 50 in-person reviews spanning years, with recent ones especially harsh.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Often labeled a tough or ; some say once you match his format it becomes easier.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated tags and comments about many long essays, journals, and constant writing.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Frequent reports of unclear lectures, tangents, and funny.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Classes revolve around multiple long essays and journals more than traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Long history of mixed in-person English experiences: older easy-pass stories clash with , and unprofessional behavior.

Main concern

, and unreliable communication make the class high-risk.

What students said

“You could not pay me to take this professor again, this has been the ”
ENG5
“ so we cannot see our grades until the end of the semester”
2759
“ .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly multi-page essays and journals with occasional tests; policy details vary and .

Essay-based assessmentIndividual essay conferencesFew traditional tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional tests rather than standardized exam software.

Multiple essaysJournalsEssay conferences
“In this class we worked on 4 essays for the whole semester and nothing else.”
2759
“Overall you write 4 papers 2 midterms and 1 final.”
ENGE

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You could not pay me to take this professor again, this has been the entire life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2024, balancing extreme praise and severe criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

34/100

“nothing is clear in his class. He ”

👎 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“RUN AWAY! QUICK WHILE YOU STILL CAN! HORRIBLE TEACHER!”

📝 Workload Reality

28/100

“All you do in this class is write essays”

⚖️

38/100

“ . Get A's in all your previous English classes? Too bad man. Expect C's.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class lecture time is pretty useless, he tells stories for most of it
  • He tends to repeat himself
  • cancels class to have independent conference of the essays

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A
  • Expect C's
  • Hard to figure out what he's looking for but once you do it's pretty easy to get an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization & Conduct

  • changes due dates without warning
  • made uncomfortable and strange comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

93

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with recurring themes of and heavy writing give strong signal despite polarized tone.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 521
3 out of 513
2 out of 519
1 out of 530

Course coverage

ENG511 reviews
ENGL58 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENGL332 reviews
Show 20 more courses
ENGL82682 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
07551 review
2306GOVT1 review
27591 review
331 review
ENG08281 review
ENG10048431 review
ENG1B1 review
ENG331 review
ENG48421 review
ENGE1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGLI00091 review
ENGLISH51 review
ENGLS41 review
GOV23061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1