Tracey Johnson

STATS15 · MATH4 · MATH5136 · MATH15 · MATH155 · MATH58 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH156 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 38/100
RMP rating: 2.9/5
Take again: 50%
Difficulty: 3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself math and tolerate a joke-heavy, strict, uneven lecture style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing PersonalityDad Jokes & TangentsTeach Yourself MathStrict Phone PolicyInconsistent Lectures

Reviews split sharply between fans of his humor and students who say he does not teach clearly.
Common complaints include , and opaque grades.
, and doing the online homework packets.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A few sections felt easy with , but , and poor grade visibility.

Online has one positive B and one harsh self-teach failure; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

and fast or incomplete coverage make the class harder than it needs to be.

Both formats include self-teaching complaints; and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and strict classroom control.

Both online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; while older fans praise humor and effort.

; sparse online evidence is split one good and one bad.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

appears sometimes, but , and harsh tests are common.

Format shift

In-person comments drive this; online evidence is too thin for a .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and packets are manageable for some, but others report lots of homework and .

Format shift

; in-person load varies by course and term.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Many students say , and teaching feels unserious.

Format shift

In-person criticism is extensive; one online review reports near-total absence of teaching presence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and pop quizzes matter more than project-style work.

Format shift

and pop quizzes; online mentions auto-graded assignments and self-study.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and personality-driven, with many students calling lectures unprepared or confusing while a minority love the energy.

Main concern

Tangents, unclear explanations, strict rules, and .

What students said

“RUN”
MATH15

“LOVE TRACEY!!! He is an amazing teacher with a great work ethic.”
math156

“ . He doesn't teach, the packets do.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student liked dad jokes and help when asked; another said the course was fully self-taught via videos with no real instructor presence.

Main concern

Risk of paying for a class that feels like teaching yourself with little live support.

What students said

“I like his dad jokes. He teaches higher level math classes so I can see why people dont love his classes.”
STATS15

“I was paying for a class to . How is this okay?”
MATH155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes feel standard-to-hard for many students, with complaints about wording and limited lecture prep.

Pop quizzesTest heavyOnline homework packetsStrict classroom rulesTrick questions reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews cite tests, pop quizzes, homework packets, and .

Pop quizzesTest heavyPacket lecturesOpaque grades

“ and tests.”
MATH15

“ 100%”
MATH155

Online

Online evidence ; one course used auto-graded work and .

Auto-graded assignmentsSelf-study videosNo Zoom classes reported

“Program did all the correcting of all assignments. I was reading a heavy amount of material to literally .”
MATH155

“The book is free online, if you need help speak up and talk.”
STATS15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“He is a but horrible math teacher. You never see your grade, hmw is way too hard and he never goes over the problems or .”
Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (2 online, 27 in person), highlighting polarizing humor versus weak math instruction. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“ . He doesn't teach, the packets do.”

⚠️ Run Warnings

30/100

“About 33 students signed up now there's only 11.THAT says something... read this and . RUN”

😂 Personality Fans

70/100

“LOVE TRACEY!!! He is an amazing teacher with a great work ethic.”

📱 Classroom Control

20/100

“Strict no phone policy even on breaks. Treats his students like they're in high-school.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Glosses over content and concepts seem difficult
Lecture was a packet he read off of and had us fill in the blanks

Theme 2

😡 About Frustrations

Talks about alcohol (and sometimes drugs) every single class
No way to check your grade, either
I was paying for a class to

Theme 3

👍 Positive Counterpoints

JUST DO THE WORK AND THIS CLASS IS EZ
great lectures willing to go into detail if asked
I LOVE TRACEY!! The !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews over many years form a clarity and classroom style.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58

4 out of 54

3 out of 54

2 out of 55

1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH155 reviews

MATH1505 reviews

MATH1555 reviews

MATH1514 reviews

math1563 reviews

Show 4 more courses

STATS153 reviews

MATH42 reviews

MATH51361 review

MATH581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1