AI Rate Professor

Health Sciences

Katie Ferraro

FDNT10 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Skip if you want current nutrition content or an engaged online instructor; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOutdated materialsUnresponsiveRude or distantLecture heavyPaid diet software
  • Course content and citations are repeatedly called outdated
  • Many students report slow or no responses to emails and questions
  • Workload is lecture-heavy with modules, quizzes, and paid software

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report A or A- despite weak teaching, so grades are attainable with module work.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is introductory nutrition but modules, lectures, and .

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

while others do not; online structure still expects module completion.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

; dominant themes are rudeness, distance, and outdated teaching.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and many students still earn A-range grades.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and paid diet software.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students cite rudeness, non-response, outdated lectures, and low engagement.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Modules mix , and tests.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are online FDNT10: mixed grades but frequent complaints about rudeness, outdated info, and weak support.

Main concern

Outdated materials and low instructor responsiveness online.

What students said

“so rude!!! that's all i'm gonna say. EXTREMELY rude”
FDNT10
“Her citation and resources are a decade old at best, with much of the information being obviously outdated.”
FDNT10
“ !”
FDNT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online assessment centers on timed quizzes and a .

Timed quizzesModule quizzesTests and optional final

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online FDNT10 uses timed quizzes per module plus tests; .

Timed quizzes (10 questions, 1 hour)Module quizzesTests and optional final
“The modules include a few lectures, a chapter or 2 to read, a discussion post, and 2 quizzes (each 10 questions and timed for 1 hour).”
FDNT10
“Message posting, diet input, 1 project, 3 tests & optional final.”
FDNT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! I deserved an A in that class IMO. I can read the book on my own and save money.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 online reviews highlighting outdated content, responsiveness issues, and mixed grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and should not be teaching.”

📚 Outdated Content

30/100

“Her citation and resources are a decade old at best, with much of the information being obviously outdated.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“so rude!!! that's all i'm gonna say. EXTREMELY rude”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so rude!!! that's all i'm gonna say. EXTREMELY rude
  • She seemed too busy for her students and never responded to any questions I had
  • Teacher felt quite distant throughout the semester

Theme 2

📖 About Course Content

  • Her information was pretty outdated
  • citation and resources are a
  • almost all of the work revolves around a diet planning software (that you have to buy access to)

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • Easy enough if you put in a few hours a week
  • there are quite a few lectures in each module that
  • so I felt in the dark

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight online reviews spanning 2016-2024 with mixed but recurring themes of outdated content and weak support.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FDNT108 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1