AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Bill Comings

BAD1 · BAD2 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if you need clear in-class teaching; only take him if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDry Textbook LecturesLots of HomeworkGroup ProjectsOnline TestsInconsistent Support
  • Many students .
  • McGraw Hill or and due on shifting days.
  • Some still pass with , and group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Several As and A-minuses appear, and unlimited Connect tries help, but tests and .

; one online review still reported an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material is standard intro accounting with , but others call it simpler than expected.

In-person reviews dominate; online sample is too small to compare content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and cold-calling; others say attendance is not graded.

; online review said mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

, but many warn of boring lectures, favoritism, and zero real teaching.

Nearly all recommendation signals come from in-person BAD1/BAD2 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, and ; others call him a tough or opinion-based grader.

Format shift

; in-person focuses on homework and tests.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple weekly McGraw Hill or Connect assignments plus group projects and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Dominant theme is reading from the book, confusion at the board, and little help when students struggle.

Format shift

; single online review is also negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and several online exams all matter.

Format shift

In-person structure is clearer; online review focuses on case papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

heavy Connect work and dry lectures, with some praise for structure and care.

Main concern

and busywork homework make students reassess the major.

What students said

“just writes numbers on the board and .”
BAD2
“Don't let these scare you, if you get 100% on assignments (unlimited tries), you should be fine”
BAD1
“Reads straight out of textbook for lectures.”
BAD1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review criticizes opinion-based grading on marketing case studies.

Main concern

rather than marketing criteria.

What students said

“This if you don't share the same opinion on a topic matter.”
BAD1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often online through course platforms; , but difficulty varies.

Online ExamsConnect HomeworkGroup ProjectRetakes Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Connect work; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

Online TestsMcGraw Hill AssignmentsGroup Project
“the and .”
BAD1
“4 online exams and 1 group project.”
BAD1
“3 or 4 exams. An .”
BAD2

Online

One online BAD1 review ; it focuses on opinion-based case grading.

Case Studies
“He assigns these marketing case studies and will grade you not based on anything related to marketing but solely your opinion.”
BAD1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and reads out of the book like a script.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 , and mixed outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

34/100

“All he does is read off the script the BOOK has.”

📚

28/100

“There are also about 3 hours of and they are only worth 10 points.”

🔀 Split Outcomes

42/100

“Dry subject, Prof Comings makes it easy to learn”

💻

58/100

“if you get 100% on assignments (unlimited tries), you should be fine, 1 group project.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most boring, dry, and meaningless lecture for two hours
  • just writes numbers on the board and
  • Prof Comings makes it easy to learn

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • 2 long mcgraw hill assignment each week
  • A ton of homework as well
  • Projects and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Climate

  • has favorites and
  • very condescending and offers no help
  • . 2 point quiz due at the start of class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews with a sharp split between very low and high scores; consistent complaints about lecture quality strengthen the teaching signal.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

BAD111 reviews
BAD28 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1