AI Rate Professor

History

Danielle Alexander

HIST171 · HIST172 · HIST21 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90.91%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want an and can keep up with the reading.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate lecturesCaringReading heavyExtra creditLenient on late work
  • Students repeatedly praise her passion, kindness, and lectures that make history click.
  • ; tests are fair if you attend.
  • Almost everyone would take her again despite one older highly negative review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students say doing the reading and ; grading focuses more on answering the question than polish.

Online and is completed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

, though reading load is consistently high.

; online still calls material interesting and reasonable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and optional in others; participation and lectures still matter for tests.

; online is frequently optional.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Overwhelming praise for passion and care, with .

; recent in-person comments are especially enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

83/100

Lenient on , and online grading prioritizes answering the prompt over grammar.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats; online stresses content over writing mechanics.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Reading is heavy and , but response work is described as doable.

Format shift

Online summer work feels busier; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

and genuine care convert non-history fans; one older review found notes and .

Format shift

; online students still say they finally learned real history.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of reading responses, discussions or papers, and .

Format shift

; online leans weekly essays and discussion posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students love her lectures, passion, and welcoming vibe; but .

Main concern

Chapter reading volume and one older claim of and .

What students said

“ time, definitely take her for history if you have the opportunity.”
HIST171
“ , but there's no trick questions and as long as you pay attention in class you'll be more than fine.”
HIST172

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections feel reasonable with , and content-focused feedback.

Main concern

Steady weekly writing plus substantial reading can pile up in summer terms.

What students said

“Genuinely was a very reasonable professor. I have taken only summer ge classes and as expected it is an essay and .”
HIST172
“If you do the reading and the . Take her class!!!”
HIST21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but fair and lecture-aligned; and discussions more than proctored exams.

Lecture-aligned testsNo trick questionsReading-based preparationWeekly essays online

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

no trick questions if you pay attention in lecture.

Lecture-based testsNo trick questionsHeavy reading prep
“ , but there's no trick questions and as long as you pay attention in class you'll be more than fine.”
HIST172

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly essays and exams.

Weekly essay and discussionContent-focused grading
“as expected it is an essay and .”
HIST172
“She didn't grade based on writing criteria and grammatical skills, but more on if you answered the question.”
HIST172

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As someone who has never been interested in !! Danielle is amazing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting passion, reading load, and fair grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Alexander loves teaching History and it shows. Her lectures were easy to listen to because she is excited about it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ .”

❤️ About Care

88/100

“One of the . Genuinely cares about students, so understanding and passionate about teaching.”

📚 Reading Load

52/100

“The amount of but I feel like though!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Made me enjoy History when I never did.
  • time
  • The first time I actually ever learned history.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is lenient about late work.
  • If you do the reading and the .
  • The work wasn't too bad

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • extremely kind and understood whatever situation anyone was in
  • , and very passionate
  • She was amazing and learned a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven mostly recent detailed reviews agree strongly, with one older negative outlier reducing perfect certainty.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST1726 reviews
HIST1713 reviews
HIST212 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values