AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Xuan Ho

COS126 · RT1813 · RAD61 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

and consistently poor trust.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMind GamesForced Retirement AllegationsLecture HeavyTrust IssuesParticipation Matters
  • Multiple students describe mind games and a hostile, untrustworthy classroom climate.
  • One detailed review alleges sexual exploitation of female students and forced retirement.
  • Older COS126 praise is an outlier against a pattern of low quality and distrust.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Grades are mixed and trust issues dominate; nothing suggests an easy A path.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content difficulty is moderate with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skip-class warnings.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Severe misconduct claims and mind-game culture make recommendation near zero.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

; students focus on fear and retaliation instead.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lecture-heavy with reading and participation, not described as .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and toxic interpersonal conduct define the experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and participation more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a severe misconduct allegation that led to forced retirement.

Main concern

Alleged exploitation of female students and retaliatory mind games.

What students said

“Xuan played many mind games w/various students. What's worse, he had certain female students subjected to odd exploitations”
RAD61
“He'll try to act friendly, almost like a mentor, but watch your back, trust nobody.”
RAD61
“I feel that he plays mind games with you if you show weakness.”
RT1813

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students barely describe exams; policy is not clearly proven from reviews.

Little exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Little exam detail
“Class is boring, not much explanation (probably lack of teacher's knowledge ).”
RAD61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Xuan played many mind games w/various students. What's worse, he had certain female students subjected to odd exploitations, have them wear skin tight clothing, pose in positions/demonstrate radiographic positioning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2024, prioritizing severe misconduct and trust themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 Safety and Trust Collapse

12/100

“He was forced to retire after enough female students came forward.”

🧠 Mind Games Climate

18/100

“I feel that he plays mind games with you if you show weakness.”

👎 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Class is boring, not much explanation (probably lack of teacher's knowledge ).”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Safety and Conduct

  • certain female students subjected to odd exploitations
  • forced to retire after enough female students came forward
  • watch your back, trust nobody.

Theme 2

🧠 About Mind Games

  • Xuan played many mind games w/various students
  • do not let him in your head
  • offer nothing that can be later used against you.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Class
  • Great teacher. Fair & willing to help students who really try but not a push over.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews span 2009-2024 with mixed detail, but the severe allegation and repeated mind-game theme are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

RAD612 reviews
COS1261 review
RT18131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values