AI Rate Professor

Agriculture & Natl Resources

Amy Housman

ANSCI20 · EQSCI25 · ANISCI20 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want an engaging animal science teacher who makes material fun and passable with steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilariousCaringInspirationalAmazing lecturesFlexible with late work
  • Most students call her hilarious, caring, and a strong vocational animal-science teacher.
  • , and lecture-heavy structure are manageable if you keep up.
  • One older and little help after a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are A or A- if , and work; one online case saw a .

; the toughest grade complaint is from an online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is informative but not conceptually brutal; and keeping up with modules.

Both formats call material manageable; and flexibility.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews split between mandatory and .

Online and in-person both report .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and , and fun.

Recommendation is strong across formats; the only harsh review is older online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Generally not a tough grader with and multiple quiz attempts, though graded-by-few-things and one tough-midterm report appear.

Format shift

Online includes the ; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and quizzes add steady work that stays manageable.

Format shift

Online mentions lots of homework and reading; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly call her hilarious, inspirational, knowledgeable, and strong at making livestock and animal science engaging.

Format shift

In-person praise for lectures and field application is strongest; online is mostly caring and flexible.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment mixes , and participation rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize modules and quizzes; review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her humor, lectures, field-style application, and fair path to an A if you read and do the work.

Main concern

and the course is lecture and reading heavy.

What students said

“This is a don't-miss teacher!”
EQSCI25
“If you just read and pay attention to lectures you'll easily pass.”
ANSCI20

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly find her sweet and flexible with late work, with manageable reading and , though one older review .

Main concern

Occasional reports of limited help and few grade components after a midterm.

What students said

“she is super sweet and flexible with late work”
ANISCI20
“I felt blindsided when I was doing well with a B and then at the end of the year after grading my midterm I had a 69.73%”
ANSCI20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and she prepares students before tests rather than using harsh proctoring.

Untimed quizzesMultiple quiz attemptsLecture prep for tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and doing the reading plus lectures is enough to pass tests.

Untimed quizzes3 attemptsLecture and reading prep
“a and 3 attempts)”
ANSCI20
“ and tests”
ANSCI20

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring or open-book policy; and few grade items.

Midterm impactFew grade components
“I was also given no reasoning or a chance for .”
ANSCI20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a don't-miss teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is super knowledgeable, has great style of delivery and plans a class that is both lecture plus application-based activities”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ .”

😄 Classroom Energy

90/100

“hilarious and makes learning about the criteria extremely fun”

⚖️

60/100

“I felt blindsided when I was doing well with a B and then at the end of the year after grading my midterm I had a 69.73%”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent vocational educator
  • Amazing lectures
  • super knowledgeable, has great style of delivery

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you just read and pay attention to lectures you'll easily pass
  • You won't pass if you don't do the work
  • flexible with late work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super sweet and flexible
  • cares dearly about animals, including humans
  • patient, kind, and is good at what she does

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews span 2017-2025 with consistent praise for humor and and format detail.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANSCI207 reviews
ANISCI202 reviews
EQSCI251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values