AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

M. J. Papa

ELEC54 · CS5011A · ELEC8882 · ELEC8881 · CIS5851 · ELEC51A · ELEC4757 · ELEC2966 · ELEC88 · ELEC60A · CIS5 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a supportive, student-success-focused teacher with easy, well-scaffolded courses.

Best fit · Easy A HunterWants students to succeedOpen-book friendlyHands-on labsAccessible outside classEasy A if you keep up
  • Students , and highly recommended for electronics and intro computing.
  • Homework design, group cheat sheets, and .
  • A few older notes mention dry delivery or scattered online help, but the dominant tone is very positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Multiple students say it is hard not to get an A with , and strong help.

; the one online review also calls the class easy if you keep up.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Content is repeatedly described as easy, beginner-level, and broken into digestible pieces.

Both formats rate difficulty very low; in-person adds fun stories and hands-on activities.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and labs occur almost every class, so showing up matters.

; online attendance is not clearly specified.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The large if possible and call her awesome, fair, and .

; the online review is milder.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

as almost impossible to fail, answers are googleable, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is strongest; online only notes that keeping up keeps it easy.

Workload

Light

78/100

Assignments and reading exist but students call the load manageable and not too challenging for beginner courses.

Format shift

Online still requires keeping up with assignments; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students say she breaks hard ideas down, cares deeply about success, and keeps dry technical topics engaging.

Format shift

In-person excellence is consistent; one old review found her dry and one online review found help scattered.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of homework, group projects, labs, and .

Format shift

In-person details are rich; online focuses on assignment keeping-up.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students praise her clarity, hands-on labs, accessibility, open-book exams, and .

Main concern

Occasional time-management issues in and rare dry delivery complaints.

What students said

“Her method of .”
ELEC51A
“ and final. !!”
ELEC8882

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the class is easy if you keep up but felt scattered with hard-to-find help.

Main concern

Limited real-time help online compared with face-to-face clarification.

What students said

“It was easy if you keep up with all the assignments.”
CS5011A
“help was no where to be found in the moments I need clarification.”
CS5011A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are open-book with class-made cheat sheets, making assessment highly student-friendly.

Open book examsOpen book finalGroup cheat sheetsHomework heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals plus group-built cheat sheets that help immensely.

Open book examsOpen book finalGroup cheat sheets
“ and final. !!”
ELEC8882
“Cheat sheets for exams are made in class as a group and help immensely.”
ELEC51A

Online

The single online review does not clearly describe proctoring or .

Assignment-focused
“It was easy if you keep up with all the assignments.”
CS5011A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her method of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, mostly in-person electronics and computing courses. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“she makes it fun by including stories and doing a lot of hands on activities”

🅰️ Easy A Path

92/100

“hard not to get an A, !!”

📘

92/100

“ and final. !!”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“M.J. truly wants all of her students to succeed, and she shows it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • break down the concepts into easy to understand, and easily digestible bits
  • makes it fun by including stories and doing a lot of hands on activities
  • knows what she is teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • hard not to get an A
  • Her method of
  • all of

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • if you can
  • always willing to help you understand the concepts

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews over many years show strong consistency on ease, support, and recommendation despite sparse formal grade data.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS53 reviews
ELEC51A2 reviews
ELEC882 reviews
28301 review
CIS58511 review
Show 7 more courses
CS5011A1 review
ELEC29661 review
ELEC47571 review
ELEC541 review
ELEC60A1 review
ELEC88811 review
ELEC88821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values