AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Heather Haluska

FNDT164 · FDNT162 · FDNT · FDNT62 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and modules; be cautious about older in-person style complaints.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsTextbook HeavyOpen Book QuizzesClear ModulesPolarizing
  • Recent online FDNT reviews often call the class doable with open-book quizzes if you read and stay on schedule.
  • , and heavy note-taking.
  • Outcomes can still be high for self-directed students, but teaching quality feels uneven by era and format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students still land A or A+, especially online with open-book quizzes, but and effort still matter.

Online reviews more often describe easy open-book paths; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content can be straightforward with reading and modules, yet several students found detail load and exams unexpectedly hard.

Online leans easier for self-paced readers; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

, while some sections mark attendance yes and focus on weekly deadlines.

Online as no; in-person is mixed or not stated clearly.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but older harsh reviews and uneven teaching keep the recommendation conditional.

Later online comments are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Open-book quizzes and , but a few report tough or sudden grade changes and .

Format shift

Online grading feels more student-friendly; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly quizzes, discussion posts, reading, and a diet analysis project are steady but usually not overwhelming.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly textbook quizzes; in-person sometimes reports huge note loads.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some call her caring and ; many older reviews call her dry, , or unhelpful.

Format shift

Online is more mixed-to-positive recently; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Weekly quizzes and a and posts.

Format shift

Online highlights open-book quizzes; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

comments and many older ones calling lectures dry, tests hard, and study guides poorly matched.

Main concern

guides, plus boring book-based powerpoints.

What students said

“The study guides didn't reflect what was on the test.”
FDNT62
“The lectures were her reading off of book. Most excrutiating class ever.”
FDNT62
“She was very responsive when I emailed for help, and and straightforward. as well.”
FDNT62

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are mixed but often workable: , and caring reminders, with some complaints about textbook cost and slow or weak support.

Main concern

, and older complaints about non-responsiveness.

What students said

“Has quizzes and . It's open book and easy.”
FDNT62
“ . Don't be afraid to bring up questions you get wrong on the quiz if you know you are right.”
FDNT162
“This is an online class, but the teacher is so harder than it's supposed to be.”
FDNT162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online quizzes are often open book, while and older comments .

Open Book QuizzesTextbook BasedTimed FinalsMisaligned Study Guides

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

do not match study guides or lectures, with heavy note-taking.

Hard TestsStudy Guides MisalignedLecture From PowerpointsOnly Two Tests In Some Terms
“The study guides didn't reflect what was on the test.”
FDNT62
“One midterm had a 4 page study guide. The amount of detail that she expected the class to learn was crazy!”
FDNT62
“ as well.”
FDNT62

Online

Online students frequently report open-book or open-note quizzes and timed finals; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Open Book QuizzesOpen NoteTimed FinalTextbook Heavy
“Has quizzes and . It's open book and easy.”
FDNT62
“ .”
FDNT162
“Barely passing the class with a C and have yet to take the final which is 50 questions within 90 mintues only.”
FNDT164

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wasn't as bad as the review say. Best FDNT class I ever took. Has quizzes and . It's open book and easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews split evenly online and in person, highlighting polarized teaching and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

42/100

“I have to agree with everybody else. She was very dry and boring and when I asked for clarification on questions she just gave me a blank look.”

📘 Online Workability

70/100

“Easy class and she is very caring + she reminds us when homeworks are due. Put in the work, you will pass.”

🧪

45/100

“The study guides didn't reflect what was on the test.”

💵 Textbook Concern

55/100

“At the start of this class I received notes from this professor that I was required to buy the $150 textbook. DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and her assignments are easy and straightforward.
  • She was very dry and boring and when I asked for clarification on questions she just gave me a blank look.
  • The lectures were her reading off of book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's open book and easy.
  • If you know a lot about nutrition already, this class is easy. .
  • and or study for.

Theme 3

📚 About Materials & Work

  • .
  • DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!! She posts lectures in the Modules and that is really the only thing you need.
  • Use MyFitnessPal vs the school software for the analysis project!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

16 reviews over many years give decent coverage, but opinions shift sharply by era and format, which lowers consistency.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

FDNT1627 reviews
FDNT627 reviews
FDNT1 review
FNDT1641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values