AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Kyla Wegman

COUN7 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take her if you want a heavy semester.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and SupportiveOrganized Weekly StructureFast Email ResponsesMakes You Want to LearnDiscussion-Heavy
  • and supports students when life happens.
  • and discussions with an end-of-course project announced early.
  • Both online and in-person students report easy As and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Both reviewers earned As with manageable weekly work and early notice of the big project.

Online felt easier (diff 1) than in-person (diff 3), but both reported As.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and discussion rather than dense theory.

Online described as light enough to pair with hard classes; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; in-person attendance was mandatory.

optional; In person: mandatory with participation mattering.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and used strong language .

Recommendation is equally strong online and in .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Two A grades and .

Format shift

Both formats reported As with .

Workload

Light

74/100

Weekly readings and is flagged early.

Format shift

Online highlighted light difficulty; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students , and someone who makes them want to keep learning.

Format shift

Praise is consistent across both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and a final project.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praised her for making social , and staying highly accessible outside class.

Main concern

and there is lots of .

What students said

“ . ”
COUN7

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students found the and discussions, a well-signaled final project, and a light difficulty load.

Main concern

Still requires weekly reading and .

What students said

“Class was great. and discussions that coincide with the readings.”
COUN7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; work is discussion and project driven.

No Clear Exam DetailsProject-Based

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review emphasizes reading and .

Weekly Discussion PostsParticipation
“Lots of reading and weekly discussion posts, but ”
COUN7

Online

Online review focuses on weekly discussions and a .

Weekly DiscussionsLarge Final Project
“A , but you are made aware early on so you have plenty of time to complete it.”
COUN7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting care, organization, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“She is a great teacher, that makes you want to keep learning.”

❤️ Support and Accessibility

92/100

“ and supportive if something came up unexpectedly.”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“ . ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and discussions
  • She really makes you think about a lot of the issues happening in society
  • makes you want to keep learning

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • This class would be great to take when your other classes are hard
  • Lots of reading and
  • A , but you are made aware early on

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • really understanding and supportive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2022 with consistent praise but very small sample and short time span.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN72 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values